boa_03 28 2016LITTLE ROCK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
SUMMARY OF MINUTES
MARCH 28, 2016
2:00 P.M.
Roll Call and Finding of a Quorum
A Quorum was present being five (5) in number.
Approval of the Minutes of the Previous Meetings
The Minutes of the February 29, 2016 meeting were
approved.
Members Present: Jeff Yates, Chairman
Rajesh Mehta
Carolyn Lindsey Polk
Robert Tucker, Vice Chairman
Brad Wingfield
Members Absent: None
City Attorney Present: Debra Weldon
."TLE ROCK BOARD OF ADJUST, AT
OLD BUSINESS:
No Old Business
NEW BUSINESS:
1.
Z -3344-C
2.
Z -5048-A
3.
Z -8172-B
4.
Z-9122
5.
Z-9123
6.
Z-9124
7.
Z-9125
AGENDA
MARCH 28, 2016
2:00 P.M.
900 S. Shackleford Road
2123 N. Arthur Street
44 Valley Club Circle
1824 Georgia Avenue
5108 Country Club Blvd.
24 Deerberry Forest Circle
6 Production Drive
MARCH 28, 2016
ITEM NO.: 1
File No.: Z -3344-C
Owner: Crain Investments, L.P. and Kelley Commercial Realty, LLC
Applicant: Bill Pendergist, Flake and Kelley Commercial
Address: 900 S. Shackleford Road
Description: West side of S. Shackleford Road, south of Hermitage Road
Zoned: O-3
Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the sign provisions of Section
36-557 to allow a wall sign without direct street frontage.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property: Office
Proposed Use of Property: Office
STAFF REPORT
A. Public Works Issues:
No Comments.
B. Staff Analysis:
The 0-3 zoned property at 900 S. Shackleford Road is occupied by an existing six
story office building (Three Financial Centre). The building is approximately
130,000 square feet in size. There is existing paved parking on the east and west
sides of the building, with a two-level parking deck on building's west side. There
are two (2) driveways from S. Shackleford Road which serve as access to the
property. The drives are located at the northeast and southeast corners of the
property.
The applicant proposes to install a new wall sign on the north fagade of the
building, as noted on the attached sketches. The wall sign will be for Sprint, a new
building occupant. The proposed wall sign will be approximately 90 square feet in
area and located at the top, northwest corner of the north building fagade. There is
an existing wall sign on the north fagade for Duncan Law Firm, which is 287 square
feet in area and located at the top, northeast corner of the north fagade.
Section 36-557(a) of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires that wall signs face
required street frontage. The east wall of the subject building is the only
wall/fagade with street frontage. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a
variance to allow the proposed wall sign on the north building fagade.
MARCH 28, 2016
ITEM NO.: 1 (CON'T.)
Staff is supportive of the requested sign variance. Staff views the request as
reasonable. The applicant is proposing the wall sign for Sprint on the north fagade
in -lieu of a wall sign on the east, street fronting fagade. Staff views this as a
reasonable trade-off. The proposed Sprint sign in combination with the existing
Duncan Law Firm sign represents a coverage of approximately 3.3% of the north
building fagade. Additionally, there is only a minimal amount of wall signage on the
east building fagade. The proposed wall signage on the north fagade will have
good visibility from the roadways to the north, and should have no adverse impact
on the adjacent properties or the general area.
C. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the requested sign variance, subject to there being
no wall signage for "Sprint" on the east building fagade.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
(March 28, 2016)
The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item
and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the "staff recommendation" above.
There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and
approved as recommended by the vote of 5 ayes, 0 noes and 0 absent.
2
.Ve
FLS & KELLEY
COMMERCIAL
Specialists in Brokerage, Development and Property Management
www.flake-kelley.com
March 1, 2016
Department of Planning and Development
City of Little Rock
723 West Markham
Little Rock, Arkansas
ATTN: Monte Moore
RE: Signage Variance Application
Three Financial Centre, 900 S. Shackleford Road, Little Rock, Arkansas
Dear Mr. Moore:
As the leasing and property management company for property referenced above, we have been
approached by a prospective tenant in the building that has requested the ability to have its
signage on the exterior of the building. The tenant desires to place their sign on the north
elevation of the building near the top as demonstrated in the attached rendering. We have been
informed that in order to place signage in this location on the building that it will require a
variance since the north elevation of the building does not front a street.
The tenant has requested the sign to be on the building's north side rather than the east side where
there is a street for several reasons. The primary reason is that the building is at the top of a hill
and the top of the north elevation would give maximum exposure to the heavy traffic volume on
Financial Center Parkway and the Big Rock Interchange. This tenant would be putting a new
regional headquarters in the property and its identity is one that thrives on brand recognition for
existing and potential customers seeing the brand having a flagship location in the market.
Secondly, the north side of the building has another tenant's sign on the building (Duncan Law
Firm), and they would like to be on the same plane as that sign already exists — only the opposite
side of the north face. The attached rendering shows the existing sign along with the proposed
new one.
Lastly, we have noticed there are several other office buildings in this same area that have similar
signs on faces of the building that do not front a street. We would request equal treatment as
other buildings in the area.
We would appreciate your consideration for this application and look forward to further
discussions.
Sincerely,
Bill Pendergist
Flake & Kelley Commercial
A MEMBER OF
S► C H A I N L I N K S 425 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 300 • Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
`� RETAIL ADVISORS (501) 375-3200 • (501) 374-9537
MARCH 28, 2016
ITEM NO.: 2
File No.: Z -5048-A
Owner/Applicant: Dave and Billie O'Neel
Address: 2123 N. Arthur Street
Description: Lot 13, Block 2, Altheimer's Addition
Zoned: R-2
Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the area provisions of Section
36-254 to allow a carport addition with a reduced rear
setback.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential
STAFF REPORT
A. Public Works Issues:
No Comments.
B. Staff Analysis:
The R-2 zoned prpperty at 2123 N. Arthur Street is occupied by a one-story frame
single family residence. The property is located at the southeast corner of N.
Arthur Street and Beacon Street. A driveway from Beacon Street near the
northeast corner of the property serves as access to a garage on the north side of
the residence. A paved alley is located along the rear (east) property line.
The applicant proposes to construct a 13 foot by 20.2 foot carport structure over an
existing concrete slab on the rear (east) of the residence, as noted on the attached
site plan. The proposed carport will be unenclosed on its north, south and east
sides. The existing driveway will be widened for access to the proposed carport
from Beacon Street. The proposed carport addition will be located slightly over six
(6) feet from the north side property line (same setback as existing residence) and
9.94 feet to 10.02 feet back from the rear (east) property line.
Section 36-254(d)(3) of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum rear
setback of 25 feet for this R-2 zoned property. Therefore, the applicant is
requesting a variance to allow the carport addition with a reduced rear setback.
MARCH 28, 2016
ITEM NO.: 2 (CON'T.)
Staff is supportive of the requested rear setback variance. Staff views the request
as reasonable. There are several accessory structures along the alley to the south
which have very little or no setback from the alley right-of-way. Accessory
structures are allowed to be located adjacent to an alley with no rear setback. The
applicant is proposing an attached carport structure instead of a carport accessory
structure. There are no accessory structures within the rear yard of this property.
As noted earlier, the proposed carport addition will be unenclosed on its north,
south and east sides. This will help eliminate any visual impact the addition may
have on the surrounding properties. Staff believes the proposed carport addition
with reduced rear setback will have no adverse impact on the adjacent properties
or the general area.
C. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the requested rear setback variance, subject to the
following conditions:
1. The carport addition must remain unenclosed on its north, south and east
sides.
2. There are to be no accessory structures constructed within the rear yard
area of this property.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
(March 28, 2016)
The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item
and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the "staff recommendation" above.
There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and
approved as recommended by the vote of 5 ayes, 0 noes and 0 absent.
2
February 4, 2016
Billie Ofileel
2123 N Arthur Street
Little Rock, AR 72207
Dept of Planning and Development
723 W Marham, Little Rock, AR
'To Whom it May Concern:
.�q'e.j =0-- z
2- so L19- A
This proposal is to build a car port over and existing slab and drive located at
2123 N. Arthur Street, Little Rock, AR consisting of post and beam frame construction
and a standard residential asphalt shingle roof as presented in the drawing enclosed.
This is proposed as a detached structure adjacent to the rear alley is not suitable due to
pavement encroachment that would limit alley access.
Thank Lou for your consideration,
Billie ONeel
MARCH 28, 2016
ITEM NO.: 3
File No.: Z -8172-B
Owner/Applicant: Arby L. and Angela L. Smith
Address: 44 Valley Club Circle
Description: Lot 7R, a replat of Lots 7 and 8, Block 20, Pleasant Valley
Addition
Zoned: R-2
Variance Requested: Variances are requested from the area provisions of Section
36-254 and the easement provisions of
Section 36-11 to allow a covered patio addition with a
reduced rear setback and which encroaches into a utility
easement.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential
STAFF REPORT
0
Public Works Issues:
No Comments.
Utility Comments: (with previous application in 2013)
Entergy — No objection to encroachment into 10 foot easement. Entergy's facilities
are along the front property line.
AT & T — No objection to encroachment.
Central Arkansas Water — No objection to encroachment.
Little Rock Wastewater — No objection to encroachment. Sewer main located in
the right-of-way of Valley Club Circle.
CenterPoint Energy - No objection to encroachment.
Staff Analysis:
The R-2 zoned property at 44 Valley Club Circle is occupied by a two-story brick,
rock and frame single family residence. There is a two -car driveway from Valley
MARCH 28, 2016
ITEM NO.: 3 (CON'T.)
Club Circle which serves as access. A circular drive is located in the front yard
area, extending along the south side of the house. There is a 10 foot wide utility
easement located along the rear (west) property line. The property backs up to the
Pleasant Valley Golf Course. The lot contains a 40 foot front platted building line.
The applicant proposes to slightly enlarge an existing patio on the rear (west) of
the residence and construct a roof over the entire patio area, as noted on the
attached site plan. The proposed covered patio area will be 18 feet by 29.8 feet in
area. The covered patio area will extend approximately two (2) feet into the
existing utility easement along the rear (west) property line. This will result in a
setback from the rear (west) property line of approximately eight (8) feet. The
covered patio area will be unenclosed on its north, south and west sides.
Section 36-11(f) of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires the Board of Adjustment
to review and approve request for building construction which encroaches into
utility easements. Section 36-254 (d) (3) requires a minimum rear setback of 25
feet. Therefore, the applicant is requesting variances to allow the covered patio
area with a reduced rear setback and which encroaches into a utility easement.
Staff is supportive of the requested variances. Staff views the request as
reasonable. The property backs up to the Pleasant Valley golf course. Similar
easement encroachments were approved for a pool and pool house near the
southwest corner of the property. When the residence was constructed it was
located well behind the 40 foot front platted building line, approximately 76 to 105
feet back from the front property line. This vastly reduced the amount of rear yard
area. None of the public utility companies have objected to previous requests for
easement encroachment in 2007 and 2013. The applicant will need to obtain and
submit updated utility letters prior to a building permit being issued for the
proposed construction. Staff believes the proposed covered patio area with
reduced rear setback and easement encroachment will have no adverse impact on
the adjacent properties or the general area.
D. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the requested setback and easement variances,
subject to the following conditions:
1. The covered patio area must remain unenclosed on its north, south and
west sides.
2. Updated utility letters must be submitted to staff prior to a building permit
being issued.
FA
MARCH 28, 2016
ITEM NO.: 3 (CON'T.)
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
(March 28, 2016)
The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item
and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the "staff recommendation" above.
There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and
approved as recommended by the vote of 5 ayes, 0 noes and 0 absent.
3
. -4 3
Arby and Angela Smith
44 Valley Club Circle �� Z —�
Little Rock, Arkansas 72212
January 29, 2016
City of Little Rock
Planning & Development
Attn: Monte Moore
723 West Markham
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334
RE: Application for Zoning Variance
44 Valley Club Circle, Little Rock, AR 72212
Dear Mr. Moore:
Enclosed you will find the Application for a Residential Zoning Variance with supporting
materials for the property located at:
44 Valley Club Circle
Little Rock, AR 72212
I am requesting a variance from the area provisions of Section 36-254 of the Little Rock Code of
Ordinance to allow the extension of an existing patio and the addition of a covered roof over said
patio.
I am proposing to extend a portion of the existing patio towards the west 6', which will extend
into the 25' building setback as well as 10' utility easement. I am also proposing to install an
asphalt shingle roof over said patio.
Enclosed are six (6) copies of the survey which identifies the existing structures on the property
and setback lines.
I have received clearance letters from each of the utilities provided to the Pleasant Valley
Subdivision. It is with these supporting documents, we are requesting a variance from the
requirements of the 4paing Ordinance.
Arby L.
MARCH 28, 2016
ITEM NO.: 4
File No.: Z-9122
Owner/Applicant: Lori Sattler
Address: 1824 Georgia Avenue
Description: Southwest corner of Georgia Avenue and Ohio Street
Zoned: R-2
Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the fence provisions of Section
36-516 to allow a fence which exceeds the maximum height
allowed.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential
STAFF REPORT
A. Public Works Issues:
No Comments.
B. Staff Analysis:
The R-2 zoned property at 1824 Georgia Avenue is occupied by a one-story frame
single family residence. The property is located at the southwest corner of Georgia
Avenue and Ohio Street. A concrete driveway at the southeast corner of the lot
serves as access. A small metal storage building is located within the west portion
of the property. The property is comprised of the north half of Lots 1, 2 and 3,
Block 4, Riffel and Rhoton's Forest Park Highlands Addition. The lots were
originally platted running north to south (front to back). Therefore the front property
line is the north property line, running along Ohio Street and not the east property
line.
The applicant recently had a six (6) foot high wood fence constructed along a
portion of the north property line, as noted on the attached site plan. The fence
actually extends into the right-of-way of Ohio Street by approximately one (1) foot.
It is the applicant's proposal to fence the entire west yard area, also noted on the
attached site plan. The applicant notes that she paid for half of the fence
installation, and the contractor disappeared with her money after only constructing
the portion of the fence along the north property line. The applicant states that the
portion of the fence which was constructed was poorly done.
MARCH 28, 2016
ITEM NO.: 4 (CON'T.)
Section 36-516(e)(1)a. of the City's Zoning Ordinance allows a maximum fence
height of four (4) feet for fences located between building setback lines and street
rights-of-way (street fronting property lines). A maximum fence height of six (6)
feet is allowed elsewhere on a residential lot. Therefore, the applicant is
requesting a variance to allow that portion of the existing and proposed six (6) foot
high wood fence which is located within the north 25 feet of the lot (front yard area)
along Ohio Street.
Staff does not support the requested fence height variance. Staff's objection is
based primarily on the orientation of the residential lots immediately to the west
and east along Ohio Street. The proposed fence is located extending into the front
yard area of these neighboring lots. It essentially "boxes in" the adjacent lots' front
yard areas, blocking the homes' visibility from the roadway and surrounding
properties.
Staff believes it would be appropriate to support a fence height variance for a six
(6) foot high wood fence extending to the west from the northwest corner of the
house, enclosing the remainder of the west yard area. In this case, the fence
would be located approximately 21 feet back from the north (front) property line.
This fence would align with the north wall of the house and other residential
structures to the east and west. If the applicant were willing to amend the
application accordingly, staff could recommend approval.
C. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends denial of the requested fence height variance.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (March 28, 2016)
Lori Sattler was present, representing the application. There were no objectors present.
Staff presented the application with a recommendation of denial.
Lori Sattler addressed the Board in support of the application. She explained that she
needed the taller fence because she had three (3) dogs and that there was a lot of
pedestrian traffic along Ohio Street. She noted that her fence contractor ran off with
her money without finishing the job. She stated that the fence contractor told her that
she did not need a permit for the fence.
Rajesh Mehta asked what portion of the fence had been constructed. Ms. Sattler noted
that only the portion along the north property line (Ohio Street) had been constructed.
Carolyn Lindsey Polk asked Ms. Sattler if she would be willing to move the fence back
to the northwest corner of the house. Ms. Sattler stated that she would be fine with
moving the fence back and amended the application accordingly. Staff noted that the
revision would be for the fence to start at the northwest corner of the house (21 feet
4
MARCH 28, 2016
ITEM NO.: 4 (CON'T.)
back from the north property line) and run west to the west (side) property line, and then
run south to enclose the remainder of the rear yard area.
There was a brief discussion regarding a time frame for removal of the existing fence
section along the north property line. Staff noted that sixty (60) days should be sufficient
time to remove the fence section.
There was a motion to approve the application as amended and noted above, with 60
days granted for the removal of the existing fence section along the north property
line. The motion passed by a vote of 5 ayes, 0 nays and 0 absent. The amended
application was approved.
3
2 —2 Cry -- I
(.Dt2.- t S- SOA zt Cj
L -r -L C -IF 9,0 C41c,
LA V , vx G c N ��--1 () Pr C �� 1,5 3
b o Gs, ton A- [L--iL S�� , tOt� i cy i c�
V-\ C4�AT7c)A 1 Inc -m -D Y4 PN -A VA Piffn C -E
k��L-io MOtE PLOTFrc-17LOA-D
1 I� S TbC.D 1�.� ✓ri �� C-ept-L-TLD R 1f') D C- C-
�� T^}-tE7V " F --7 O F tD O
rte Atcp PPt -D -�-D p U ur+-" �L�C-E
er
C
�r �
p ,L)G l�
rt��-c�� n�.pl
l-rt DiSHpp v�,D ( T-�f Do -)IV nA�-DE
c (�)n�I Pry) 0 t"F kOA-5 V 5 F b f,� f [LI
`bore _ `1�n ei\)T -Lj I C)vioT
MARCH 28, 2016
ITEM NO.: 5
File No.: Z-9123
Owner: Brendan and Leigh Quirk
Applicant: Ellen Yeary
Address: 5108 Country Club Blvd.
Description: Lots 12 and 13, Block 12, Newton's Addition
Zoned: R-2
Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the area provisions of Section
36-254 to allow a porch addition with a reduced front
setback.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential
STAFF UPDATE:
The applicant submitted a letter to staff on March 14, 2016 requesting this application
be withdrawn, without prejudice. Staff supports the withdrawal request.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
(March 28, 2016)
Staff informed the Board that the applicant submitted a letter to staff on March 14,
2016 requesting this application be withdrawn, without prejudice. Staff supported the
withdrawal request. The item was placed on the consent agenda and withdrawn,
without prejudice by the vote of 5 ayes, 0 noes and 0 absent.
Yeary Lindsey Architects
February 17, 2016
Mr. Monte Moore
Office of Planning and Development
723 West Markham
Little Rock, AR 72201
Re: Brendan and Leigh Quirk
5108 Country Club Blvd.
Little Rock, AR 72207
Dear Monte,
Please find attached our submittal to the Little Rock Board of Adjustments requesting a
variance with regard to the property at 5108 Country Club Boulevard.
The Owners wish to make improvements to the current property which will require the
Board's approval. They would like to add a covered front porch to the entrance of their
home. The addition of this porch will result in a reduction of the front yard setback from
25' to 17'-6". We feel that this request is reasonable because of the 80' right of way on
Country Club now. With the reduced setback the front of the porch will still be more than
41' away from the curb.
The proposed sitting porch will be 10' deep by 26` long and will be supported by
columns complementary to the style of the house. Many homes on this street have
porches facing Country Club Boulevard that create a friendly street presence. The
finished floor of this proposed porch would be no more than 28" above grade with most
of the porch floor being very close to the existing front yard level.
If you have any questions or need further information regarding our request please feel
free to contact me at the number below or by cell phone at (501) 519-3729.
We appreciate your consideration of our request.
Sincerely,
0
Ellen Yeary,
3416 Old Cantrell Road Little Rock, AR 72202 501-372-5940 FX: 501-663-0043
MARCH 28, 2016
ITEM NO.: 6
File No.: Z-9124
Owner/Applicant: Francis and Sally Baumann
Address: 24 Deerberry Forest Circle
Description: Lot 112, Brodie Creek Addition
Zoned: PRD
Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the fence provisions of Section
36-516 to allow a fence which exceeds the maximum height
allowed.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential
STAFF REPORT
A. Public Works Issues:
No Comments.
B. Staff Analysis:
The PRD zoned property at 24 Deerberry Forest Circle is occupied by a two-story
frame single family residence. The property is located at the southeast corner of
Deerberry Forest Circle and Persimmon Path. A paved alley is located along the
rear (south) property line. A two -car wide driveway from the alley serves as
access to the property. The lot contains a 20 foot platted building line along the
front (north) and street side (west) property lines. There is an existing four (4) foot
high wood fence which encloses a portion of the west side and rear yards.
The applicant proposes to replace the four (4) foot high wood fence with a six (6)
foot high wood fence, as noted on the attached site plan. The fence will extend
from near the northwest corner of the residence to the west (street side) property
line. The fence will run along the west property line approximately 75 feet and then
turn and tie into the southwest corner of the residence.
Section 36-516(e)(1)a. of the City's Zoning Ordinance allows a maximum fence
height of four (4) feet for residential fences located between a building setback line
and a street right-of-way (street — fronting property line). Other fences may be
constructed to a height of six (6) feet. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a
MARCH 28, 2016
ITEM NO.: 6 (CON'T.)
variance to allow a portion of the proposed six (6) foot high fence between the 20
foot platted side building line and the west (Persimmon Path) property line.
Staff is supportive of the requested fence height variance. Staff views the request
as reasonable. The proposed six (6) foot fence height located between a side
platted setback and a street right-of-way will not be out of character with this
neighborhood. The two (2) residential lots across Persimmon Path to the west and
south have six (6) foot high wood fences, similarly placed on the lots as the proposed
fence, with the same setback/right-of-way relationship. Staff believes the proposed
six (6) foot high wood fence will have no adverse impact on the adjacent properties
or the general area.
C. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the requested fence height variance, as filed.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
(March 28, 2016)
The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item
and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the "staff recommendation" above.
There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and
approved as recommended by the vote of 5 ayes, 0 noes and 0 absent.
2
January 6, 2016
Dear Board of Adjustment:
I am contacting you in regards to our request to build a taller fence for our property's
yard, 24 Deerberry Forest Circle. My husband and I respectfully request permission to
build a 6 -foot fence for privacy and security reasons.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Sally Baumann
Enclosure: 6 copies of survey
MARCH 28, 2016
ITEM NO.: 7
File No.: Z-9125
Owner: Community Living, Inc.
Applicant: Georganna Huddleston, Arkansas Enterprises for the
Developmentally Disabled, Inc.
Address: 6 Production Drive
Description: Southwest corner of Production Drive and Distribution Drive
Zoned: 1-2
Variance Requested: Variances are requested from the area provisions of Section
36-320 and the building line provisions of Section 31-12 to allow an awning addition with
a reduced front setback and which crosses a platted building line.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter
Present Use of Property: Skills Training Center for Adults with Developmental
Disabilities
Proposed Use of Property: Skills Training Center for Adults with Developmental
Disabilities
STAFF REPORT
IV
Public Works Issues:
No Comments.
Staff Analysis:
The 1-2 zoned property at 6 Production Drive is occupied by a one-story
commercial building. The property is located at the southwest corner of Production
Drive and Distribution Drive. The property is occupied by the Arkansas Enterprises
for the Developmentally Disabled's (AEDD) Lacy Landers Adult Skills Training
Center. Approximately 200 adults with developmental disabilities attend the adult
skills training center. Paved parking is located along the east and north sides of
the building, with driveways from Production Drive and Distribution Drive. There is
an existing outdoor seating/patio area with picnic tables and benches along the
north side of the building, at its northeast corner. The lot contains a 40 foot platted
building line along the front (east) property line and the street side (north) property
line.
The applicant proposes to construct an awning over the existing patio area, as
noted on the attached site plan. The covered patio will run 91 feet along the side
MARCH 28, 2016
ITEM NO.: 7 (CON'T.)
of the building, and extend from the building 14'— 4" to 24'— 2", encroaching
across the street side platted building line. This will result in a setback from the
north side property line of approximately 15'— 10" to 25'— 8". The proposed
covered patio will be unenclosed on its east, west and north sides.
Section 36-320(e)(1) of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum front
setback of 50 feet (from the east property line) for this 1-2 zoned lot. Section 31-
12(c ) of the Subdivision Ordinance requires that building line encroachments be
reviewed and approved by the Board of Adjustment. Therefore, the applicant is
requesting variances from these ordinance standards to allow the awning addition
with reduced front setback and which crosses a street side platted building line.
Staff is supportive of the requested variances. Staff views the request as
reasonable. The proposed awning will cover an existing patio area with benches
and picnic tables at the northeast corner of the building. The covered patio area
will be unenclosed on its east, west and north sides. This will help eliminate any
visual impact the addition might have on the neighboring properties to the east and
west. The proposed awning cover does exceed the minimum requested 15 foot
side setback from the north property. Staff believes the proposed awning patio
cover with reduced front setback and platted building line encroachment will have
no adverse impact on the adjacent properties or the general area.
If the Board approves the building line variance, the applicant will have to complete
a one -lot replat reflecting the change in the platted side building line for the
addition. The applicant should review the filing procedure with the Circuit Clerk's
office to determine if the replat requires a revised Bill of Assurance.
C. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the requested setback and building line variances,
subject to the following conditions:
1. Completion of a one -lot replat reflecting the change in the side platted
building line as approved by the Board.
2. The building addition must remain unenclosed on its east, west and north
sides.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
(March 28, 2016)
The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item
and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the "staff recommendation" above.
There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and
approved as recommended by the vote of 5 ayes, 0 noes and 0 absent.
. Arkansas Ent#- prises for the
Developmentally Disabled, Inc.
AEDD www.aeddinc.org
ADMINISTRATION
105 East Roosevelt Road • Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 • 501-666-0246 • FAX 501-666-2113
LANDERS CENTER
6 Production Drive • Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 • 501-562-6579 • FAX 501-537-4206
ACS WAIVER OFFICE
6 Production Drive • Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 • 501-374-7538 • FAX 501-907-5070
SAMMIE GAIL SANDERS CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER
1300 West 18th Street • North Little Rock, Arkansas 72114 • 501-907-5716 • FAX 501-907-5723
February 15, 2016
Little Rock Planning Commission
Little Rock City Hall
500 West Markham Street
Little Rock, AR 72201
Re: Non-residential zoning variance
To whom it may concern,
--A7
�- 9iz5
Arkansas Enterprises for the Developmentally Disabled (AEDD) is requesting a variance for the Lacy
Landers Adult Skills Training Center located at #6 Production Drive, Little Rock. The requested variance
is required before a construction permit can be issued for a facility improvement project.
AEDD received a $50,000 grant from United Way to fund the construction of a handicap accessible
outdoor social area for approximately two -hundred adults with developmental disabilities that attend
the adult skills training center. The construction project includes a metal awning to provide shade over
six handicap accessible picnic tables and nine benches that will easily accommodate seventy-five people
at a time.
The awning will run 91 feet in length and be attached to the side of the existing building, with a width of
25 feet to offer adequate shade for all of the seating areas. A 25 foot variance is requested in addition
to the existing 5 inch variance where the width of the awning will extend past the building setback. CBM
Construction is the contractor for the project and will obtain the building permit upon notification that
AEDD's request for a variance has been approved.
Thank you for your consideration of our request. Please contact me if additional information is
required.
Sincerely, 44vklc�
4bol"Y
Georganna Huddleston
CEO/Executive Director
�,lnitedYllYl1
A United Way Agency
"AEDD is in compliance with Titles VI & VII of the Civil Rights Act and is operated,
managed and delivers its services without regard to sex, race, color or National Origin."
Q�,to EXce//P'�®
*car
* ACCRMTED L
DATE: 8 26
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT VOTE RECORD
C ,
C,O,r\Sk-^ t )�rO--LN h fA- /Pt% vGR��SkAAA
MEMBER
LINDSEY POLK, CAROLYN t/
MEHTA, RAJESH
TUCKER, ROBERT I
WINGFIELD, BRAD L/
YATES.JEFF — pil I'll,
TIME IN AND TIME OUT
LINDSEY POLK, CAROLYN
MEHTA, RAJESH IAZ
TUCKER, ROBERT
WINGFIELD, BRAD Q
YATES,JEFF
a
Meeting Adjourned r 1 P.M.
AYE ® NAYE ABSENT ABSTAIN
MARCH 28, 2016
There being no further business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 2:16
p.m.
Date:MrIc