Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutpc_08 17 2000LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNING AND REZONING HEARING MINUTE RECORD AUGUST 17,2000 4:00 P.M. I.Roll Call and Finding of a Quorum A Quorum was present being eight (8)in number. II.Members Present:Craig BerryBillRector Judith Faust Hugh Earnest Bob Lowry Pam Adcock Fred Allen,Jr. Rohn Muse Members Absent:Mizan Rahman Obray Nunnley,Jr. Richard Downing City Attorney:Cindy Dawson III.Approval of the minutes of the July 27,2000 SpecialCalledmeeting: The Commission determined that corrections were necessary and did not approve the minutes. LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNING AND REZONING HEARING AGENDA AUGUST 17,2000 4:00 P.M. I.DEFERRED ITEM: A.Z-6861 4819 Stagecoach Road R-2 to C-3 B.LUOO-11-01 A Land Use Plan Amendment in the I-430 Planning District from Low Density Residential to Mixed Use. C.Z-6886 The Church at Rock Creek —Long-Form POD II.NEW ITEMS: 1.LUOO-09-01 Various Land Use Plan Amendments in the I-630 Planning District 2.LUOO-09-02 Various Land Use Plan Amendments in the I-630 Planning District 3.Z —6011-A Mabelvale West Road 0-3 to C-1 3.1 LUOO-15-01 A Land Use Plan Amendment in the Geyer Springs West Planning District;NW corner of Mabelvale West and Mabelvale Main; MX to NC 4.Z-6888 2109 John Barrow Road R-2 to 0-3 4.1 LUQQ-10-01 A Land Use Plan Amendment in the Boyle park Planning District;2100 Block of John Barrow Road;SF to 0 5.Z-6894 4811,4815,4817 Stagecoach Road R 2 to C-3 5.1 LUOO-10-02 A Land Use Plan Amendment in the Boyle park Planning District;4800 Block of Stagecoach Road;SF to C 1 Agenda,Page Two II.NEW ITEMS:(Cont.) 6.Z-6895 16205 Raines Road R-2 to R-7A &Site Plan Review 7.LUOO-05-01 A Land Use Plan Amendment in the Downtown Planning District;an area bounded by Cantrell Road and the Union Pacific Railroad;STD to PI and MX B.LUOO-09-03 A Land Use Plan Amendment in the I-630 Planning District;an area bounded by South Elm,South Pine,Plateau and West 7 Streets;MX and NC to PI 9.G-25-177 —A Street Name Change of Fourteenth Street to Daisy L.Gatson Bates Drive from Commerce Street to Woodrow Street 2 OOO CU I v'7 (03gKlL-'„l I C(O~ ,;h &1'll 't "&J ~ 1I I llh ~ .J I 1 'IO:::..t,~."'.'ll'. .It C Il I':t.,JI11'k llVHA&h k)IV&;1 0 h I I Ih, 03 E 0 WT."L CO '..ll'I I IJ .;/ L CL ~gust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:A FILE NO.:Z-6861 Owner:Shirley Brooks Applicant:Shirley Brooks Location:4819 Stagecoach Road (T-Bone Inn) Request:Rezone from R-2 to C-3 Purpose:Bring existing,nonconforming use into compliance with zoning. Size:1.66+acres Existing Use:Bar/lounge,restaurant STAFF REPORT The applicant is currently in discussions with the City regarding right-of —way acquisition as part of the Asher Avenue widening project and asks that the item be deferred to the August 17,2000 Planning Commission agenda. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(JULY 6,2000) The applicant was not present.There were no objectors present.Staff informed the Commission that the applicant had requested deferral to the August 17,2000 meeting. The item was placed on the Consent Agenda for deferral to the August 17,2000 meeting.The vote was 11 ayes,0 noes and 0 absent. STAFF UPDATE The right-of-way issues have not been resolved.Staff recommends that the item be deferred to the September 28, 2000 commission meeting. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(AUGUST 17 2000) The applicant was not present.There were no objectors present.Staff informed the Commission that the applicant had requested deferral to the September 28,2000 meeting. ~gust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:A (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-6861 The item was placed on the Consent Agenda for deferral to the September 28,2000 meeting.The vote was 8 ayes,0 noes and 3 absent. 2 ftugust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:B FILE NO.:LU00 —11-01 Name:Land Use Plan Amendment —I-430 Planning District Location:Northwest corner of I-430 and W.36th St. Receuest:Lcw Density Residential and Mixed Office Commercial to Mixed Use Source:The Church at Rock Creek PROPOSAL /REQUE ST: Land Use Plan amendment located in the I-430 Planning District from Low Density Residential to Mixed Use.Mixed Use provides for a mixture of residential,office and commercial uses to occur.A Planned Zoning District is required if the use is entirely office or commercial or if the use is a mixture of the three.The applicant wishes to develop church and ministry facilities. Prompted by this Land Use Amendment request,the Planning Staff expanded the area of review to include the area between I-430 and Bowman Road and the area shown as Mixed Office Commercial at the northeast corner of the W.36 Street /Bowman Road intersection.With these changes,the entirety of the Mixed Office Commercial would be eliminated. The additional area would result in Mixed Use along the north side of W.36 Street from I-430 to Bowman Road and along Bowman Road north of 36 Street. EXISTING LAND USE AND ZONING: The expanded area is currently zoned R-2 Single Family and the applicant's property is approximately 40.00+acres of the 75 +acres under consideration for amendment.The entire expanded area is zoned R-2 Single Family.Three houses are located in the expanded area on W.36 Street just south of the applicant's vacant property.The rest of the expanded area is vacant.The residential subdivision to the north is zoned R-2 Single Family and consists of single- family houses.A nursing home in a Planned Commercial Development zone is located on Bowman Road next to the northwest corner of the expanded area.The vacant property east of I-430 is zoned R-2 Single Family.The southeast corner of I-430 and W.36 Street is vacant property zoned r ugust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:B (Cont.)FILE NO.:LUOO-11-01 Open Space where Panther Branch flows into Brodie Creek. The property to the south of W.36 Street is zoned MF-12 Multifamily and R-2 Single Family.The land zoned MF-12 Multifamily is vacant.The land zoned R-2 Single Family is occupied by single-family houses built on large lots.The vacant property to the west of the expanded area located on the west side Bowman Road is zoned R-2 Single Family. FUTURE LAND USE PLAN AND RECENT AMENDMENTS: On April 16,1999,a change was made from Single Family to Suburban Office on Aldersgate Road north of W.20 Street about a mile northeast of the applicant's property. On June 18,1996 multiple changes took place along Shackleford Road between W.36 Street and Col.Glenn Road about a half mile east of the applicant's property. On January 16,1996,a change from Low Density Multifamily to Suburban Office east of Bowman,south of Kanis about a mile north of the applicant's property. On August 1,1995 a change took place from Single Family to Suburban Office about a half mile east of the applicant's property. On June 20,1995 multiple changes took place along Bowman Road about a third of a mile west of the applicant's property. The expanded area is shown on the Future Land Use Plan as Low Density Residential and Mixed Office Commercial.North of the expanded area is shown as Single Family with a small area shown as Low Density Residential on Bowman Road.The property on the east side of the freeway is shown as Mixed Office Commercial with Park /Open Space shown where Panther Branch flows into Brodie Creek.The south side of W.36 Street is shown as Mixed Office Commercial with a strip of Park /Open Space shown along Brodie Creek.The property to the west of the expanded area is shown as Low Density Residential and Suburban Office. MASTER STREET PLAN: 1-430 is shown on the Master Street Plan as a Freeway while W.36 Street and Bowman Road are shown as minor arterials. A proposed collector is shown located west of the applicant's property to connect W.36 Street to Bowman Road.The Master Street plan does shows a proposed interchange between W.36 Street and I-430.On January 2 August 17,2000 ITEM NO.:B (Cont.)FILE NO.:LUOO —11—01 1991 the Arkansas State Highway Commission denied approval of a City of Little Rock request for an interchange at this location due to a lack of need.The Arkansas State Highway Commission stated that it would reconsider its decisions if the need should arise.A Class II Bikeway is shown along W. 36 Street connecting Bowman Road to Rock Creek.A second Class II Bikeway is shown along Bowman Road connecting Executive Center Drive to Colonel Glenn Road. PARKS: However the Master Parks Plan shows a Priority One Proposed Open Space along Panther Branch and Brodie Creek.Panther Branch is not af fected by this proposed amendment.Brodie Creek flows near the southeast corner of the expanded area on the opposite side of W.36 Street.Proposed parkland is shown on the Master Parks Plan about a mile upstream on Brodie Creek west of Bowman Road.The proposed parkland is not affected by this amendment. CITY RECOGNIZED NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PLAN: The applicant'property does not lie in an area covered by a neighborhood plan. ANALYSIS: The expanded area is located at the intersection of two minor arterials in an area characterized by some low-density development and an abundance of vacant land.A change to Mixed Use could complement the mix of uses in the two neighboring areas shown on the Future Land Use Plan as Mixed Office Commercial and Suburban Office.This change will leave a small buffer of Low Density Residential at the northwest corner of the expanded area between the proposed Mixed Use and the current area shown as Single Family.The most intense use in the area is the Single Family located on Shady Ridge Drive.The greatest effect this amendment could have would be on property located west of I-430.Any development in this area will most likely have an impact on the subdivision north of the applicant's property.Any change in this area is not likely to effect property located east of I-430 since the freeway would serve as a physical buffer between uses.Since most of the neighboring properties to the south and west are vacant,this amendment will effect any future development or land use changes that could occur.Approval of this amendment does not 3 august 17,2000 ITEM NO.:B (Cont.)FILE NO.:LU00-11-01 necessarily mean that non-residential development will take place.A Varity of single family and other residential developments could take place without a Planned Zoning Development.Any mix involving non-residential components would require a Planned Zoning Development. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: Notices were sent to the following neighborhood associations:Birchwood N.A.,Campus Place P.O.A., Kensington Place P.O.A.,Pennbrook/Clover Hill Place P.O.A., Sandpiper N.A.,Sewer District ¹147,Twin Lakes "A"N.A., Twin Lakes "B"N.A.,and Westbrook N.A.Staff has received no comments from area residents. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staf f believes the change is appropriate. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(AUGUST 3,2000) Brian Minyard,City Staff,made a brief presentation to the commission.This item was followed immediately by the presentation of item 6 by Monte Moore so the discussion of item 6 could coincide with the discussion for item 6.1.See item 6 for a complete discussion concerning the Long Form POD Conceptual Plan.A motion was made to defer items 6 and6.1 to the August 17 meeting and was approved with a vote of 8 ayes,0 noes,and 3 absent. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(AUGUST 17,2000) Brian Minyard,City Staff,made a brief presentation to the commission.This item was followed immediately by the presentation of item C by Monte Moore so the discussion of item C could coincide with the discussion for item B.See item C for a complete discussion concerning the Long Form POD Conceptual Plan.A motion was made to approve the item as presented.Item B was approved with a vote of 8 ayes, 0 noes,and 3 absent. 4 Au~-st 17,2000 ITEM NO.:C FILE NO.:Z-6886 NAME:The Church at Rock Creek —Long-Form POD —Conceptual Plan LOCATION:Northwest corner of Interstate 430 and West 36 Street DEVELOPER:ENGINEER: The Church at Rock Creek McGetrick and McGetrick 4217 S.Shackleford Rd.,319 East Markham St.,Suite 202 Suite 1 Little Rock,AR 72201 Little Rock,AR 72204 AREA:40 acres NUMBER OF LOTS:1 FT.NEW STREET:Construction of new collector street ZONING:R-2 ALLOWED USES:Single Family Residential PROPOSED USE:Church Facility and Ancillary Uses VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED:None recpxested. A.PROPOSAL/REQUEST: The applicant proposes to rezone the 40 —acre site at the northwest corner of Interstate 430 and West 36 Street fromR-2 to POD.The applicant is proposing a conceptual site plan for a church facility and related ancillary uses. The development plan includes construction of a collectorstreetfromWest36Street,at the southwest corner of the church property,to Bowman Road.Access to the church development will be gained by utilizing a private boulevardstreet,which will run from near the southeast corner of the church property to the proposed collector street near thecenterofthesiteatthewestpropertyline. August 17,2000 ITEM NO.:C (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-6886 Please see the attached conceptual site plan for theapplicant's approximate proposed placement of the various buildings,parking areas,softball fields and street design. Attached is the church'description of development,whichincludesalistofthebuildingsproposed(with maximum building area)and other site features within the proposed church campus. B.EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site is undeveloped and wooded,with varying degrees ofslope.Interstate 430 is located along the property's east boundary.There are single family residences to the south and southeast along West 36 Street.There is also an animal clinic on the south side of West 36 Street.Therearealsosinglefamilyresidencesimmediatelynorthofthisproperty.The property immediately west of this site isalsoundevelopedandwooded.The property further west,along the west side of Bowman Road,is zoned R-2 andcontainsascatteringofsinglefamilyresidenceson largelots.There is also a nonconforming plant nursery businessalongthewestsideofBowmanRoad. C .NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing,staff has met with three (3)of theadjacentpropertyownerstothenorthwhohaveexpressedconcernswiththeproposeddevelopment.The Sandpiper,JohnBarrowandGibralterHeights/Point West/Timber Ridge Neighborhood Associations were notified of the publichearing. D .ENGINEERING COMMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS: 1.Collector Street connecting Bowman to 36 must be shown on plan and constructed.36 Street is a minorarterial.Improve to standards and as a minimum improve under I-430 to allow right turn and center left turn into proposed driveway. 2.Right-of-way dedication required per the "MSP".Right- of-way required is 45 feet from centerline.(36 "Streetarterialright-of-way cuts southwest corner)3.Easements shown for proposed storm drainage.4.Easements for proposed stormwater detention facilities.5.Proposed design of street conforming to "MSP"is required. 2 August 17,2000 ITEM NO.:C (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z —6886 6.Street cross-sections of proposed streets at 100 feet stations are required. 7.Street profiles showing existing and proposed centerlines are required. 8.Sidewalks shall be shown conforming to Sec.31-175 and the "MSP". 9.Driveways shall conform to Sec.31-210 or Ordinance 18,031. 10.Stormwater Detention per Ordinance 14,787 and the "Drainage Manual"is required. 11.Direction of flow for watercourses leaving the propertyisrequired. 12.Drainage area size and runoff coefficient for watercourses entering the tract is required. 13.Proposed ditch sections is required,with easements. 14.Description of existing surface features including soil type and vegetation is required. 15.Prepare letter for streetlights as required by Sec. 31-403. 16.Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for approval prior to start of work. 17.Existing topographic information at maximum five-foot contour interval 100 base flood elevation. 18.A Sketch Grading and Drainage Plan per Sec.29-186 (e) will be required with a building permit. 19.A Grading Permit for Special Flood Hazard Area per Sec. 29-186 (b)will be required. 20.A Development Permit for Flood Hazard Area per Sec. 8-283 is required. 21.Contact the ADEQ for approval prior to start of work. 22.Submit a Traffic Impact Study for the proposed facility. Address how the proposed facility affects turn movements at the intersection of Bowman and 36 Street. 23.Skewed intersections cause safety and maneuvering problems.All streets must be designed to intersect at 90-degree angles. 24.The circulating road around the facility must be built to collector street standards. E .UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING: Wastewater:Sewer main extension required with easements to serve property. AP&L:No Comment. 3 August 17,2000 ITEM NO.:C (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-6886 ARKLA:No Comment received. Southwestern Bell:No Comment received. Water:On site fire protection will be required.A development fee applies,based on the size of connections and an acreage charge of $150 per acre applies,in addition to normal charges for water service.These fees will apply for the fire service connection and for any meters whether they are off the public water main or thefireserviceline.Other special conditions apply if the meter(s)are off the private fire service line.Backflow prevention will be required on the domestic service for the medical clinic and possibly other connections. Contact Carroll Keatts (phone 377-1241)at the Water Works regarding backflow prevention requirements. Fire Department:Private fire hydrants will be required. Contact Dennis Free at 918-3752 for details. Count Plannin :No Comment received. CATA:Site is not on a dedicated bus route;however,the proposed development should be designed to allow bus/transit access. F.ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: Plannin Division: This request is located in the I-430 Planning District.The applicant's property is shown as Low Density Residential on the Future Land Use Plan.The request is for a zone change from R-2 Single Family to Planned Office Development.The applicant wishes to develop the property for facilities to serve the needs for a variety of church ministries that include recreation,counseling,automobile repair shop, auditorium,atrium,and class rooms.The proposal will require a Land Use Plan Amendment. Cit Reco nized Nei hborhood Action Plan: This area is not covered by a city recognized neighborhood plan. 4 August 17,2000 ITEM NO.:C (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-6886 Areas set aside for land use buffering along the western perimeter and portions of the southern perimeter do not meet the minimum width requirement of 27 feet.The full width requirement without transfers is 40 feet. The proposed street buffer width along I-430 meets ordinance requirements when averaged out,however,in one area it drops to a width of 10 feet.The full width requirement without transfers being 56 feet. Since this is a heavily wooded site,the City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees as feasible.Extra credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of 6 inch caliper or larger. This site will be required to be screened from the residential properties to the north,south and west.This screen may be a wooden fence with its face side directed outward or dense evergreen plantings.Credit toward fulfilling this requirement can be given for existing vegetation that provides the year-round screening necessary. G.SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT:(JULY 13,20QQ) Pat McGetrick and John McMorran were present,representing the application.Staff briefly described the proposed conceptual plan. In response to questions from staff,Mr.McMorran noted that the north buffer area would be undisturbed and that the softball fields would be lighted.The location of the softball field was briefly discussed. The Public Works requirements were discussed at length, including the collector street location.Tad Borkowski,of Public Works,noted that a traffic impact study was needed. This issue was briefly discussed. The required land use buffers were also discussed.It was noted that additional buffer width was needed along the western and portion of the southern perimeters. 5 August 17,2000 ITEM NO.:C (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-6886 After the discussion,the Committee forwarded the POD to the full Commission for resolution. H .ANALYSIS: The applicant submitted a revised conceptual plan drawing tostaffonJuly20,2000.The revised plan addresses some of the concerns as raised by staff and the Subdivision Committee.The collector street between West 36 Street and Bowman Road has been shown on the plan.The softball fields have been moved further north away from the single family residences along West 36 Street and the total parking figure has been reduced from 2,000 to 1,750.A church facility with a seating capacity of 7,000 would typically require a minimum of 1,750 parking spaces. Although staff has no initial objection to the proposed church development at this location,there are several issues relating to site design features which need to be worked out and resolved prior to the public hearing.There are also several Public Works issues (traffic impact information,stormwater detention facilities,etc.)which need to be resolved. As noted in paragraph C.,staff has met with several concerned neighbors who own property immediately north of this proposed development.Staff has suggested that the church meet with these neighbors to attempt to resolve some of their concerns. I.STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Although staff has no initial objection to the proposed church development of this property,there are several site design and Public Works issues that need to be resolvedpriortoPlanningCommissionconsideration. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(AUGUST 3,2000) Mark Evans,John McMorran,Pat McGetrick and Kevin Hutchinson were present,representing the application.There were several persons present with concerns.Staff briefly described the proposed conceptual site plan and noted that the church had submitted a revised site plan and a phasing plan.Staff offered a recommendation of approval with the following conditions: 6 August 17,2000 ITEM NO.:C (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-6886 1.Compliance with the requirements as noted in paragraphs D, E and F of the agenda report. 2.Any site lighting should be low-level and directed away from adjacent property. 3.The 100 foot buffer along the north property line must be undisturbed,with construction fencing in place prior to any site work. John McMorran addressed the Commission in support of the application.He reviewed the overall site plan and the proposed phases of the development. Mark Evans,senior pastor of the Church at Rock Creek,addressed the Commission in support of the application.He discussed the proposed ancillary (ministry)uses and explained each of these specific uses.He noted that the proposed Church of the Rock Creek ministries are modeled after a church in Florida,where he was recently employed. James Woods addressed the Commission with concerns.He noted that the neighborhood is not opposed to a church being located on the site.He stated that the neighborhood wished to have additional time to consider the revised site plan and phasing plan.He noted concern with liability issues associated with some of the ancillary (ministry)uses. Lisa Byrum also addressed the Commission with concerns.She noted that she was not opposed to a church being located on the property,but would like additional time to discuss and work out the issues that the neighborhood has with the proposed development. Reggie Clow also addressed the Commission with concerns.He noted that he does not oppose the church use,but has concerns with some of the ministry uses.He stated that he felt the church would have no control over the persons who will be temporarily housed on the property.He asked the Commission to defer the application. A deferral of the application was briefly discussed.Pastor Evans stated that if the Commission wished to defer the application,the church would request a deferral for two (2) weeks. Commissioner Lowry asked about the current church attendance. Pastor Evans noted that the church currently has an average 7 August 17,2000 ITEM NO.:C (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-6886 attendance of 1,200 persons.Commissioner Lowry asked Pastor Evans when the church anticipates having a 7,000 membership. Pastor Evans stated that at the present growth rate,it would be 15 to 18 years. Commissioner Lowry asked if any thought had been given to the traffic issues. Bob Turner,of Public Works,noted that the church would front on a minor arterial (West 36 Street)and that Bowman Road is also classified as a minor arterial.He noted that these streets would eventually be constructed to minor arterial standards and be able to handle the future traffic for the church,with 7,000 projected members.Mr.Turner noted that he is comfortable with the street phasing plan and how the streets will handle the future traffic. Jim Lawson,Director of Planning and Development,noted that he anticipates the land around the church property to develop by the time the church reaches the 7,000 member mark,with a street system that will handle the future traffic. Mr.Clow also commented on issues related to traffic,parking and building size. Vicky Foti addressed the Commission with traffic and noise concerns related to the proposed development.She also noted concern with property values in the area and with the church ministry uses. Mr.Lawson commented that the Church had obtained enough property (at the suggestion of staff)to support a long-term plan and accommodate the church'long-term goals. Vice-Chair Berry commented that the applicant had made changes in the site plan as recommended by the Subdivision Committee.He commented on how a single family development could include as much traffic and building area as the proposed church development,with less buffer area. Commissioner Rector noted that the intersection of Bowman Road and a 36 Street will be a major intersection in the future and briefly discussed.He also noted that the church made an effort to revise the site plan based on the Subdivision Committee review.He encouraged the neighborhood to work with the church in resolving their issues. 8 August 17,2000 ITEM NO.:C (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-6886 Mr.Turner estimated a traffic count of 50,000 vehicles per day at the intersection of Bowman Road and West 36 Street,at build-out. Commissioner Muse asked how far this site was from the Immanuel Baptist Church site and how large that church site is.Mr. Turner noted that this site is approximately 3.5 miles from the Immanuel Baptist site and that the Immanuel Baptist property is approximately 20 acres in size. Mr.Turner noted that a single family development on this property would create a large amount of traffic.The traffic issues were briefly discussed. A motion was made to defer the application to the August 17,2000 agenda.The motion passed by a vote of 8 ayes,0 nays and 3 absent. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(AUGUST 17,2000) Mark Evans,John McMorran and Kevin Hutchinson were present, representing the application.There were several persons present with concerns.Jim Lawson,Director of Planning and Development, introduced the item and noted that a meeting had taken place between the church and the neighborhood on August 11,2000. John McMorran addressed the Commission in support of the application.He noted that the proposed phasing of the project was discussed at the meeting with the neighborhood.Mr.McMorran noted that the church would conform to the future landscape requirements with regards to the parking and buffer areas.He noted that the north undisturbed buffer had been increased to 100feetandthataconstructionfencewouldbeinplacepriortoanysitework.He noted that the construction fence would accommodate the drip lines of the trees on the 100-foot line. Mr.McMorran also noted that the church would install a fence along the north property line,but the neighbors did not want the fence.He also noted that the area which was cleared due to thesoiltestingwouldbereplanted. Commissioner Lowry asked Mr.McMorran if the application would be amended to include the conditions in the church letters to the neighborhood dated August 14 and August 16,2000.Mr.McMorran 9 August 17,2000 ITEM NO.:C (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-6886 responded that the application would be amended to include these conditions. Commissioner Lowry asked if the church would comply with the new proposed landscape ordinance.Mr.McMorran stated that the site would comply with the new ordinance.Commissioner Lowry askediftheapplicationwouldbeamendedtoacceptthiscondition. Mr.McMorran responded that the application would be amended. Mark Evans,Senior Pastor,also addressed the Commission in support of the application.Pastor Evans briefly discussed the meeting which the church had with the neighborhood. Reggie Clow addressed the Commission,representing the Sandpiper Creek neighborhood.Mr.Clow noted concern with the proposed ancillary church uses.He read a prepared statement (see attached)and discussed.He asked to what extent the area cleared for soil samples would be replanted.He also noted that the neighborhood wished to retain an option for the permanent fence along the north property line,in case trespassing becomes a problem in the future.Mr.Lawson asked who would determine if there is a future problem. Mr.McMorran noted that the church would replant the number of trees which were removed for the soil samples.He stated that these trees would be three (3)inches in caliper or greater. There was a brief discussion concerning a permanent fence along the north property line.Mr.Lawson suggested that if the fence was requested by the neighborhood in the future,that the issue should come back to the Planning Commission.The issue of retaining an option for the fence was discussed. Commissioner Lowry asked if the church and neighborhood could meet outside the board room and resolve the outstanding issues. Kevin Hutchinson stated that the church would like to address the issues one-by-one before the Commission. Pastor Evans and Mr.McMorran addressed the Commission and noted the following: 1.The buildings on the site will be sound-proofed. 2.The buildings'acade will not be constructed of metal, concrete blocks,etc. 10 August 17,2000 ITEM NO.:C (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-6886 3.There will be no steeple. 4.The building elevations will not be determined until after the finished grades are in place. 5.Maximum building heights will range from 65 to 80 feet, depending on the finished grades. 6.The following information was offered regarding the Children's Care Center: a.The church would like a maximum of 12 children in the center. b.The church could not guarantee that the children would not be referred from the judicial system,but the center would not be a half-way house.c.Children under the care of the church will not be allowed to drive. d.The church is not sure how long a temporary stay will be. 7.The following information was offered regarding the car ministry: a.The maximum building area will be 2,500 square feet. b.This facility will not grow any larger.c.Only minor car repairs will be done (oil change,wash, wax,etc.).No salvaged cars will be accepted. d.This building will also be for storage of equipment for the entire campus. e.The facility will accommodate two (2)cars at a time (inside the building).f.After repair and cleaning,the cars will be parked on the parking lot. g.There will be no salvaged auto parts stored on the property. h.There will be no test-driving of the vehicles in the surrounding neighborhoods. 8.The following information was offered regarding the Medical Care Center: a.The church is not willing to limit the days of operation. b.The church does not know what the hours of operation will be at this time. 9.There will be no clear cutting of the site at this time.The church will remove the trees along the I-430 Frontage for visibility at the time of Phase I development. 10.There will be no A/C cooling tower on the site.Smaller package units will be used. 11 August 17,2000 ITEM NO.:C (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-6886 11.The church cannot agree to having no construction take place on weekends. Commissioner Lowry asked what type of cases would be accepted by the medical clinic.Pastor Evans noted that this would be a walk-in clinic for minor medical illnesses. Commissioner Rector noted that the hours for the medical clinic needed to be determined.Pastor Evans stated that the clinic would be open three (3)days per week with hours of 9:00 a.m.to 9:00 p.m.This issue was briefly discussed. Mr.Clow noted that the neighborhood supported the church,but has had concerns about specific details of the development plan. Lisa Byrum addressed the Commission with concerns.She stated that she was concerned that the trees between Phase 1 and I-430 will be clear —cut with the Phase I development.She noted concern with the noise from I-430 if this area is clear-cut. This issue was discussed. Commissioner Lowry noted that the church has agreed to conform to the new landscape ordinance.Chair Adcock stated that the neighborhood is getting more protection (with the 100 foot undisturbed buffer)than would be required with the new ordinance.This issue and the issue of building permit approval were discussed.Bob Turner,Director of Public Works,noted that other areas of the site could be cleared with the first phase of development as long as the clearing conforms to ordinance standards. Mr.Clow noted that the neighborhood asked for a definition of "temporary stay"for the proposed centers.Commissioner Rector stated that a limit for temporary stay should be determined. Pastor Evans stated that "temporary stay"would be defined as 12 months or less.The issue was briefly discussed. Ruth Bell addressed the Commission.She stated that she was originally concerned with the car ministry use,but the church had addressed most of her concerns.She stated that she did not want to see a used car lot created.This issue was briefly discussed.Pastor Evans noted that the car ministry/maintenance building would accommodate two (2)cars at a time (inside). 12 August 17,2000 ITEM NO.:C (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-6886 Commissioner Rector stated that a maximum number of car ministry vehicles which would be parked on the site should be determined. Pastor Evans stated that the maximum number of car ministry vehicles which would be parked on the site at any one time would be twelve (12)vehicles. Commissioner Earnest stated that the church members would not want to have a used car lot created. Vice-Chair Berry expressed concern with the level of regulatory detail that the Planning Commission was applying to the church application.He briefly discussed this issue. Commissioner Faust expressed concern that the discussion of this application would become a precedence for other church developments.This issue was briefly discussed. Commissioner Lowry asked about traffic issues.Bob Turner discussed the traffic study done by Peters and Associates.He discussed the peak volume of traffic which would occur on Sundays and Wednesdays.Mr.Turner noted that the proposed street improvements for phase one development should be adequate as determined by the traffic study.He noted that additional improvements will have to be made to the road system prior to the time of full church buildout.He noted that the church is only a part of the overall future development of this area. Commissioner Lowry asked if Public Works had a problem with the proposed development from a traffic standpoint.Mr.Turner noted that Public Works had no problem with the proposed church development. Vice-Chair Berry noted that there would not be much difference in the amount of traffic that the church will generate and the amount that would be generated by a single —family development. Commissioner Rector discussed the amount of detail that was discussed with this application.He noted that this proposed church development is a different,unique type of use,and that the amount of detail that was discussed should be expected.He asked if there were any unresolved issues.There was no response from the audience. 13 August 17,2000 ITEM NO.:C (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-6886 There was a motion to approve the POD as recommended by staff,to include the amendments to the application and additional project information as offered by the applicant at this meeting.Mr. Lawson noted that the motion did not include the requirement for fence construction along the north property line.The motion passed by a vote of 8 ayes,0 nays and 3 absent. 14 C z -(.W4 p~~ The Church at Rocl Creek Conceptual Planned Office Development 19 JL11&.,2000 The Church at Rock Creek is currently in the planning stages of its permanent facilities master plan.The property the church has selected to pursue is a 40-acre tract on the corner of I-430 and West 36"'treet.Due to the time constraints on the purchase of the propeNy,a Conceptual POD has been advised. The Church at Rock Creek is a mission-oriented church that seeks to reach out and make an impact on the community.Main church activities are primarily on Sunday mornings and Wednesday evenings.The church propertv vvould house not only the main church facilities,but also a chapel;centers for youth,children and families;food bank;vvelfare to work training center;pregnancy care center;medical clinic;apartments;dorms for visiting groups;maintenance storage building for church vans and equipment;and two outdoor recreation soAball fields.All of the different ministry buildings mentioned about will be owned and operated by the church. The following is a detailed description of each portion of the Master Plan: 1 The Main Church Facilities:370,000 total sq.A. a.Worship center for 7,000 with balconies and exterior day-lighting 80,000 sq.A. b.Large foyer atrium which will house a bool store,restaurant and a coAee shop 30,000 sq.A. c.Activities and fitness area with two basl-etball courts,a stage and a kitchen '20,000 sq A d.Preschool and Children education areas 60,000 sq A e.Youth education area 10,000 sq.A. f.ivlinistry offices and conference rooms '20,000 sq.A. g.Conference classrooms 10,000 sq.A. h.Additional foyer spaces 10,000 sq.A. i.Corridor and mechanical 100,000 sq.A. The main church facilities will be located on the NW corner of'the property giving it high visibility fiom I-430.There will be multiple levels of which the lower and main levels will have direct ground access.The church is looking f'ar into the f'uture with the master plan and will build in phases starting ~vith the activities building and an entrance foyer.Building materials will include brick,stone,precast,metal, glass and exterior insulation finish system. 2 The Ministry Campus: a.One building for a Welfare to Work Training program,a Pre&nancv Care facility and a Food Bank 5,000 sq A. b.One building for a Medical Clinic 5,000 sq.A. c.One apartment building housing 0 one bedroom apartments 4,000 sq A d.One IIomeless I'arnily Care Center for 0 faniilies 6,000 sq.A. e.One Children's Emergency Center for 15 children 5,000 sq.A. f One Teenage Care Center for 10 teenagers 5,000 sq.A. Each of these ministry buildings will be one or ~vo level.Parking will be available at each building and will be part of the total parking for the church. Additional Church Site Features: a.A 4,000 sq.A.Chapel b.R.V.hookup locations for 5 vehicles c.ih faintenance Storage Building d.An 8,000 sq.A.lodge type dorm that sleeps 50 people e.2 soAball fields with lights f.Playgrounds,Picnic Areas,Walking trails g.An 80'-0"buAer zone along the north property line. h.Parking for 1,750 cars including the required number of accessible spaces i.Signage at the streets and around the site to meet all city requirements and restrictions. j.On site fire protection. k.Landscape screening from adjacent residential properties. The existing site has a natural drainage pattern that will be maintained and improved.The site will be developed in a manner that will maintain as many existing trees and as much of the natural setting as is feasible for the church to miruster to the community.Additional landscaping will be in accordance with the city of Little Rock ordinance.Site lighting will be will be lov level and will be focused inward,away from the surrounding property as much as possible. RECK~ JUL 0 k K~II BY:M~' XP-C OCK CREEK CARE CENTER +Ps= The Rock Creek Care Center is a ministry of The Church at Rock Creek.The Rock Creek Care Center is designed to meet the spiritual,physical and emotional needs of hurting people in our community through several ministries.The Rock Creek Care Center is modeled after a church's ministry in Florida where our Senior Pastor Mark Evans served. Children's Care Center The Children's Care Center provides temporary housing for abused or neglected children in our community.The children are at the Care Center until they can be returned to their homes,placed with relatives or placed in long-term foster care.The Center's capacity will be up to 12 children at a time.The house parents for the Center will be trained and certified by the State of Arkansas. Famil Care Center The Family Care Center provides temporary housing for families in transition.The center will be able to house 3 —4 families at a time.The Center will provide food, housing and assistance in securing employment and permanent housing.The Resident Director of the FCC will oversee this ministry. Teena e Care Center The Teenage Care Center provides temporary housing and support for teenagers who are dealing with the effects of abuse or neglect.The Center will provide a safe haven for 10 —12 displaced teenagers.The goal for the teenagers will be to return them to their homes,place with relatives or place in Long-term foster care.The house parents for the center will be trained and certified by the State of Arkansas. Welfare to Work Trainin Center /Pre nanc Care Center /Food Bank This building will house three ministries. 1.)Our Welfare to Work Training Center is an expansion of our present Welfare to Work ministry.Working in partnership with the Department of Human Services we train and mentor our Welfare dependant neighbors for permanent employment with sustainable wages. 2.)Our Pregnancy Care Center will offer free pregnancy testing and individual counseling.The Center also provides maternity and infant clothing,and referrals for medical,financial,vocational and legal assistance.Birthing, parenting and nutrition classes are also available. 3.)Our Food Bank is an expansion of our Food Bank Ministry.We make food available to people in need as they contact us.The Church at Rock Creek works in partnership with the Arkansas Food Bank Network. ~ddt t f An extension of our present CARS Ministry people are given opportunity to donate their used cars to the church.Then the church gives that car to someone who is unable to afford transportation to work,school,etc.Most of the recipients are single parents. Medical Care Center The Medical Care Center would provide incidental medical treatment at no cost to the patient.Staffed by volunteer medical personnel this center will be open 2 —3 days per week meeting some of the medical needs of people unable to afford treatment. V~tL d This lodge will provide housing for groups that come to Little Rock for a few days to do volunteer work at our church campus or at other areas in the city. A~tt This apartment facility will provide a temporary place to stay for family members of a person from out of town who is undergoing extended medical treatment in a local hospital.It could also be used to provide temporary housing for a minister and his family in transition. REC El&i"D JVL P,7 )(~II I 11607 Shady Ridge Drive Little Rock,AR 72211 (501)221-1273 Duly 22,2000 City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development f~-c 723 West Markham Street Z -bSgh Little Rock,AR 72201 Dear Mr.Carney: I am writing in regards to the notification I received to rezone the property at the northwest corner of Interstate 430 and West 36"Street.The request has been made to rezone the property from R-2 to POD to allow for the construction of a church and associated facilities. My husband and I reside in Sandpiper Creek subdivision on a lot that borders the above mentioned property.This zoning change will have a direct NEGATIVE EFFECT on our home now and in the future.We purchased our land based on the fact that the land behind our home was to be zoned residential,We also chose to build within the city limits to have the security of knowing that our land and interests were protected by city authorities such as the Department of Planning and Development, I hope your department will consider how our property value will decrease,traffic will increase, and vandalism/theft will be of greater concern when you make your recommendation to the Planning Commission.Our property will lose value and be harder to sell if there is a HUGE church COMPLEX visible from our backyard.The church sanctuary is planned to seat 7 000I people,36'"street has no exit off interstate 430 and is barely wide enough for 2 cars to pass safely,much less that many people traveling on it weekly.The church is planning to serve battered women and troubled youth,in addition to refurbishing junk cars to give to the poor. As admirable as their plans are,it would be a detriment to our neighborhood to allow this to happen! 1 My husband and I urge you to recommend that the above referenced land remain zoned R-2, Sincerely, C RECEIVED Johnny "Shane"and Melissa "Lisa"Byrum JUL 2 5 2000 BY' ..august 17,2000 ITEM NO.:1 Name:Land Use Plan Amendment —I630 Planning District Location:Various R~e est:Public Institutional,Multifamily,Industrial, Single Family,Low Density Residential,Light Industrial and Commercial to Light Industrial, Commercial,Park Open Space,and Public Institutional. S TAFF RE PORT: As part of the review of the Oak Forest and Stephens Neighborhood Areas during the neighborhood planning process, the two steering committees agreed to allow the Asher Corridor Committee to create a plan along the corridor. This committee is made up of approximately 40 property owners,business owners and developers.Earlier this year the Planning Commission had a rezoning request before them along the Asher Corridor.The Planning Commission asked the Asher Corridor Committee to make a recommendation on the rezoning request and also asked if the committee could review the land use plan and the zoning classifications along Asher.Their goals were to recognize existing uses and to confine Industrial uses to the south side of Asher whenever possible.The Asher Corridor Committee developed a set of Land Use Plan changes that more accurately reflect the existing land uses.The changes are scattered along Asher Avenue between University and the Asher/Roosevelt split.This report will review each group of changes one at a time rather than use the customary format for Land Use Plan Amendments. 1.The site is located north and west of the intersection of Asher Avenue and Fair Park Blvd.The existing uses are:Safeway Ice Cream and Worth James Construction. Currently,the Land Use Plan shows this area as Public Institutional.The current Land Use Classification to the west is PI,east is MF/C,south is PI,and north is PI.Fair Park Blvd.is classified as a Minor Arterial by the Master Street Plan.The zoning of the site is I2.The proposal is to recognize the existing uses and .august 17,2000 ITEM NO.:1 change the classification to Light Industrial.Staff has received no letters or calls of opposition. 2.The site is located at the northwest corner of Asher Avenue and Fair Park Blvd.The existing uses are:oil change drive thru,carwash,Hub Cap Annie,barbershop, restaurant and two auto repair businesses.Currently, the Land Use Plan shows this area as Public Institutional.The current Land Use Classification to the west is C,east is C/MF,south is C,and north is PI.Fair Park Blvd.is classified as a Minor Arterial and Asher Avenue is classified as a Principal Arterial by the Master Street Plan.The zoning of the site is C3.The proposal is to recognize the existing uses and change the classification to Commercial.Staff has received no letters or calls of opposition. 3.The site is located north and east of the intersection of Asher Avenue and Fair Park Blvd.The existing useis:vacant.Currently,the Land Use Plan shows this area as Multifamily.The current Land Use Classification to the west is PI,east is MF,south is C,and north is MF.Fair Park Blvd.is classified as a Minor Arterial and Asher Avenue is classified as a Principal Arterial by the Master Street Plan.The zoning of the site is C3.The proposal is to recognize the entire site as Commercial.Staff has received no letters or calls of opposition. 6.The site is along Asher Avenue between Monroe Street and the abandoned rail line.The existing uses are:a gas station,auto repair business,liquor store and two furniture sales stores.Currently,the Land Use Plan shows this area as Industrial.The current Land Use Classification to the west is I,east is C,south is I, and north is I.Asher Avenue is classified as a Principal Arterial by the Master Street Plan.The proposal is to recognize the existing uses and change the classification to Commercial.Staff has received nolettersorcallsofopposition. 7.The site is the abandoned rail line that is between 31'ndBrackStreets.The existing use is vacant. Currently,the Land Use Plan shows this area as Industrial.The current Land Use Classification to the west is I,east is SF,south is I,and north is SF.No adjacent street is classified as collector or above by 2 august 17,2000 ITEM NO.:1 the Master Street Plan.The proposal is to recognize the entire site as Park Open Space.Staff has received no letters or calls of opposition. 10.The site is located at the northeast corner of 30 and Washington Streets.The existing uses are:storefront church and auto repair business.Currently,the Land Use Plan shows this area as Multifamily.The current Land Use Classification to the west is SF,east is C, south is C,and north is MF.No adjacent street is classified as collector or above by the Master Street Plan.The proposal is to recognize the entire site as Commercial.Staff has received no letters or calls of opposition. 11.The site is located at the northeast corner of Peyton and 29 Streets.The existing uses are:a church, vacant lots and six single-family homes.Currently,the Land Use Plan shows this area as Low Density Residential.The current Land Use Classification to the west is SF,east is LDR,south is C,and north is LDR. 29 Street is classified as a collector by the Master Street Plan.The zoning of the site is 03.The proposalistorecognizetheentiresiteasOffice.Staff has received no letters or calls of opposition. 12.The site is located at 2716 South Lewis Street.The existing use is the Lewis Street Church of Christ,the parking lot,and the fellowship center.Currently,the Land Use Plan shows this area as Low Density Residential.The current Land Use Classification to the west is LDR,east is C,south is C,and north is LDR. 29 Street is classified as a collector by the Master Street Plan.The proposal is to recognize the existing use and change the classification to Public Institutional.Staff has received no letters or calls of opposition. 13.The site is located at the southeast corner of Cedar and 27 Streets.The existing use is single-family homes.th Currently,the Land Use Plan shows this area as Single Family.The current Land Use Classification to the westisPI,east is C,south is C,and north is SF.Cedar and Pine Streets are classified as collectors by the Master Street Plan.The proposal is to recognize the entire site as Commercial.Staff has received nolettersorcallsofopposition. 3 ~gust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:1 14.The site is located at the southeast corner of Roosevelt and Maple Streets.The existing use is:a transmission repair shop.Currently,the Land Use Plan shows this area as Light Industrial.The current Land Use Classification to the west is PI,east is C,south is LI,and north is C.Roosevelt is classified as a Principal Arterial by the Master Street Plan.The proposal is to recognize the entire site as Commercial. Staff has received no letters or calls of opposition. 15.The site is located at the southwest corner of Asher Avenue and Adams Street.The existing use is an auto paint shop.Currently,the Land Use Plan shows this area as Industrial.The current Land Use Classification to the west is C,east is C,south is LI,and north is C.Asher Avenue is classified as a Principal Arterial by the Master Street Plan.The proposal is to recognize the entire site as Commercial.Staff has received no letters or calls of opposition. 17.The site is located at the southeast corner of Mary Street and Asher Avenue.The existing uses are:two car repair shops,furniture store and vacant lot. Currently,the Land Use Plan shows this area as Industrial.The current Land Use Classification to the west is LI,east is C,south is I,and north is I. Asher Avenue is classified as a Principal Arterial by the Master Street Plan.The proposal is to recognize the entire site as Commercial.Staff has received no letters or calls of opposition. 18.The site is located at the southwest corner of Mary Street and Asher Avenue.The existing use is Fliteline auto repair.Currently,the Land Use Plan shows this area as Light Industrial.The current Land Use Classification to the west is C,east is I,south is LI, and north is I.Asher Avenue is classified as a Principal Arterial by the Master Street Plan.The proposal is to recognize the entire site as Commercial. Staff has received no letters or calls of opposition. 20.The site is in the vicinity of the intersection Anna and 34 Streets.The existing uses are:nine vacant lots,th recycling center,asphalt company,entrance road to an industrial site,and thirteen single-family homes. Currently,the Land Use Plan shows this area as 4 &gust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:1 Multifamily.The current Land Use Classification to the west is LI,east is LI,south is I,and north is C.No adjacent street is classified as collector or above by the Master Street Plan.The proposal is to recognize the entire site as Light Industrial.Twenty-seven certified letters were mailed to this area and three letters of opposition were received by Staff. 21.The site is located northeast of the intersection of33'nd Jane Streets.The existing use is:the southern half of the property owned by Sonic. Currently,the Land Use Plan shows this area as Multifamily.The Land Use Classification to the west is MF,east is MF,south is MF,and north is C.Asher Avenue is classified as a Principal Arterial by the Master Street Plan.The zoning of the site is C4.The proposal is to recognize the entire site as Commercial. Staff has received no letters or calls of opposition. 22.The site is located at the northeast corner of 33'treetandMabelvalePike.The existing use is:the Ritz Motel.Currently,the Land Use Plan shows this area as Multifamily.The current Land Use Classification to the west is C,east is C,south is LI, and north is C.Asher is classified as a Principal Arterial and Mabelvale Pike is classified as a Minor Arterial by the Master Street Plan.The zoning of the site is C3.The proposal is to recognize the entire site as Commercial.Staff has received no letters or calls of opposition. 23.The site is located at the southwest corner of 34 " Street and Mabelvale Pike.The existing uses are: three single family homes and a vacant lot.Currently, the Land Use Plan shows this area as Light Industrial. The current Land Use Classification to the west is LI, east is I,south is PI,and north is C.Mabelvale Pike is classified as a Minor Arterial by the Master Street Plan.The zoning of the site is C1 and C3.The proposal is to recognize the entire site as Commercial. Staff has received no letters or calls of opposition. 24.The site is located west and south of the intersection of Mabelvale Pike and Asher Avenue.The existing uses are:two single family homes,a vacant lot and auto repair shop.Currently,the Land Use Plan shows this area as Light Industrial.The current Land Use 5 .~gust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:1 Classification to the west is PK/OS,east is C,south is LI,and north is PI.Asher Avenue is classified as a Principal Arterial by the Master Street Plan.The zoning of the homes and lot is C3 and the zoning of the business is R2.The proposal is to recognize the entire site as Commercial.Staff has received no letters or calls of opposition. 25.The site is located east of the Village Shopping Center and south of Coleman Dairy. The existing use is vacant.Currently,the Land Use Plan shows this area as Commercial.The current Land Use Classification to the west is C,east is I,south is PK/OS,and north is C.Asher Avenue is classified as a Principal Arterial by the Master Street Plan.This property was recently given to UALR to be used as soccerfields.The proposal is to recognize the entire site as Park Open Space.Staff has received no letters or calls of opposition. Within I-630 Planning District,there have been four approved plan changes in the last five years.Three of the four were generated by the Stephens Area Neighborhood Plan. These were to create nodes of mixed uses and to recognize an existing church.The forth change was on 7 "Street from SF to MX to allow a non-residential use of abandoned service station. Staff identified property owners using Pulaski County Assessor records in late April.One hundred and forty-three property owners were sent a certified letter explaining the Land Use change and requesting a response (approve/disapprove).Included in this certified mailing was a business reply envelope for the property owner to return a response.This notice resulted in twelve letters of opposition.The Land Use Plan changes included in this item are intended to more accurately reflect the existing conditions and likely short to mid-term development pattern within the area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:Approval 6 .gust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:1 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(AUGUST 17,2000) The item was placed on the consent agenda for approval.A motion was made to approve the consent agenda and was approved with a vote of 8 ayes,0 noes,and 3 absent. 7 .august 17,2000 ITEM NO.:2 Name:Land Use Plan Amendment —I630 Planning District Location:Various Receuest:Public Institutional,Multifaeily,Industrial, Single Family,Low Density Residential,Light Industrial and Commercial to Light Industrial, Commercial,Park Open Space,and Public Institutional . S TAFF RE PORT: As part of the review of the Oak Forest and Stephens Neighborhood Areas during the neighborhood planning process, the two steering committees agreed to allow the Asher Corridor Committee to create a plan along the corridor. This committee is made up of approximately 40 property owners,business owners and developers.Earlier this year the Planning Commission had a rezoning request before them along the Asher Corridor.The Planning Commission asked the Asher Corridor Committee to make a recommendation on the rezoning request.and also asked if the committee could review the land use plan and the zoning classifications along Asher.Their goals were to recognize existing uses and to confine Industrial uses to the south side of Asher whenever possible.The Asher Corridor Committee developed a set of Land Use Plan changes that more accurately reflect the existing land uses.The changes are scattered along Asher Avenue between University and the Asher/Roosevelt split.This report will review each group of changes one at a time rather than use the customary format for Land Use Plan Amendments. 4.The site is located at 5100 Asher Avenue.The existing use is Kaufman Lumber.Currently,the Land Use Plan shows this property as Industrial.The current Land Use Classification to the west is C,east is I,south is C,and north is I.Asher Avenue is classified as a Principal Arterial by the Master Street Plan.The proposal is to recognize the existing use and change the classification to Commercial.Staff has received a letter of opposition from the property owner. ~gust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:2 5.The site is located south of the abandoned rail line and northeast of the intersection of Mary Street and Asher Avenue.The existing uses are:lumber yard,saw sharpening shop,four single family homes.Currently, the Land Use Plan shows this area as Industrial.The current Land Use Classification to the west is MF,east is SF,south is I,and north is SF.No adjacent street is classified as collector or above by the Master Street Plan.The proposal is to recognize the entire site as Commercial.Staff has received a letter of opposition from three separate property owners. 19.The site is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Anna and 34 Streets.The existing uses are:six single family homes and a vacant lot. Currently,the Land Use Plan shows this area as Multifamily.The current Land Use Classification to the west is LI,east is LI,south is I,and north is C. No adjacent street is classified as collector or above by the Master Street Plan.The proposal is to recognize the entire site as Light Industrial.Staff has received five letter of opposition. Within I-630 Planning District,there have been four approved plan changes in the last five years.Three of the four were generated by the Stephens Area Neighborhood Plan. These were to create nodes of mixed uses and to recognize an existing church.The forth change was on 7 Street from SF to MX to allow a non-residential use of abandoned service station. Staff identified property owners using Pulaski County Assessor records in late April.One hundred and forty-three property owners were sent a certified letter explaining the Land Use change and requesting a response (approve/disapprove).Included in this certified mailing was a business reply envelope for the property owner to return a response.This notice resulted in twelve letters of opposition.The Land Use Plan changes included in this item are intended to more accurately reflect the existing conditions and likely short to mid-term development pattern within the area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:Approval 2 august 17,2000 ITEM NO.:2 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(AUGUST 17,2000) Staff presented the item.Mr.Coleman,Co-Chair of the Asher Corridor Steering Committee,was also present to answer any questions.Chair Adcock stated there were no cards of objection on the item.Commissioner Faust recognized Mr.Coleman and his Steering Committee on the work they had done and are currently doing on the Asher Corridor.A motion was made to approve item 2 as presented by Staff and was approved with a vote of 8 ayes,0 noes, and 3 absent. 3 ~august 17,2000 ITEM NO.:3 FILE NO.:Z-6011-A Owner:Robert Ashcraft and Family Applicant:Wi 1 liam Putnam Location:North side of Mabelvale West Road,west of Darris Drive Request:Rezone from 0-3 General Office to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial Purpose:Future commercial development Size:5.23+acres Existing Use:Vacant,sparsely wooded SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING North —Undeveloped;zoned R-2 South —Single Family;zoned R-2 and 0-3 East —Vacant and Convenience Store with gas pumps; zoned C-3 West —Undeveloped;zoned 0-3 and Single Family; zoned R-2 PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS 1.Mabelvale Pike is listed on the Master Street Plan as a minor arterial.A dedication of right-of-way 45 feet from centerline is required. 2.Dedicate regulatory floodway as a drainage easement. With Buildin Permit 3.A Sketch Grading and Drainage Plan per Sec.29-186(e) will be required with a building permit. 4.A Grading Permit for Special Flood Hazard Area per Sec. 29-186(b)before building permit. 5.A Development Permit for Flood Hazard Area per Sec.8-283 before building permit. 6.Stormwater detention ordinance applies to this property. 7.Easements for proposed stormwater detention facilities are required. 8.Sidewalks shall be shown conforming to Sec.31-175 and the "MSP". 9.All driveways shall be concrete aprons per City Ordinance. ~august 17,2000 ITEM NO.:3 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-6011-A PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT The site is located on a CATA Bus Route. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION All owners of property located within 200 feet of the site, all residents within 300 feet and the Pinedale,Mavis Circle and Southwest Little Rock United for Progress Neighborhood Associations were notified of the rezoning request. LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT The site is located in the Geyer Springs West Planning District.The adopted Plan currently recommends MX (Mixed Use)for this site and the C-3 zoned properties adjacent to the east.A Land Use Plan Amendment has been filed for the property,asking that the Plan designation be changed from MX to NC (Neighborhood Commercial).The C-1 Neighborhood Commercial rezoning request would conform to the NC Land Use Plan designation.See item no.3.1 on this agenda, LU00-15-01. The property lies within the area covered by the Chicot West/I-30 South Neighborhood Action Plan that was adopted on November 4,1997.The stated economic goal of the action plan is to "provide a mixed commercial/residential environment that will promote the safety,attractiveness and value of the area while creating a competitive and adaptable economic climate that encourages investment and diversity of employment opportunities."Staff believes the Neighborhood Commercial Land Use Plan Amendment and rezoning request meet the objectives and action statements of the Action Plan. STAFF ANALYS IS The request before the Commission is to rezone this undeveloped,5.23+acre tract from "0-3"General Office to "C-1"Neighborhood Commercial.The property is located north of the new alignment of Mabelvale Pike/Mabelvale West, west of its intersection with Darris Drive.The property is within the "town center"of the Mabelvale community located north of the main line of the Union Pacific Railroad.The 2 ~~gust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:3 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-6011-A applicant proposes to develop a new Family Dollar Store on a portion of the property once it is rezoned.That use will require a conditional use permit in C-l. The property is bounded on the east by undeveloped C-3 zoned property.A convenience store with gas pumps is located on C-3 zoned property one block east of the site.The undeveloped,R-2 zoned property to the north lies in the floodway and is designated Parks/Open Space on the Land Use Plan.The R-2 zoned properties to the west consist of single family homes,vacant tracts and a day care center which may or may not be open.The small portion of this 0-3 zoned tract which extends farthest west into the residentially zoned area is not included in this rezoning request.That portion of the tract is undeveloped and no immediate development of that area is proposed.South of Mabelvale Pike/Mabelvale West Road the zoning and use are varied.This area contains single family homes on R-2 and 0-3 zoned properties,industrial uses on I-2 zoned tracts and a mixture of office and commercial uses on 0-1 and C-3 zoned properties. The purpose and intent of the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial district states: "The C-1 neighborhood commercial district is designed to accommodate limited retail developments within or adjacent to neighborhood areas for the purpose of supplying daily household needs of the residents for food, drugs and personal services.This section applies to such district.Commercial uses within this district should not depend on market areas larger than the neighborhood served.The district may also be used in conjunction with existing commercial developments as an extension of such established commercial district.The C-1 neighborhood commercial district shall generally be located at arterial or collector street intersections and within walking distance of residential areas." Stated objectives within the Economic Development Goal of the Chicot West/I-30 South Neighborhood Action Plan are: 3 .august 17,2000 ITEM NO.:3 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-6011-A ~Attract better restaurants. ~Attract neighborhood oriented businesses. ~Attract a grocery store to the area. Action statements within that plan to reach the objectives are: ~Create incentives to attract a sit —down restaurant and a grocery store to the area. ~Identify and try to attract desirable businesses that are oriented toward the middle class consumer. ~Promote the area as a desirable place for commercial interests to locate.Work with the City and Chamber of Commerce to attract businesses. ~Expand Neighborhood Commercial uses at the intersections of arterials. Staff believes the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial zoning requested is compatible with uses and zoning in the area. The property is within the node established by the intersection of three arterials;Mabelvale Main,Mabelvale Pike and Mabelvale West.The C-1 zoning would seem to meet the stated economic goal and objectives of the neighborhood action plan.The one proposed use for a portion of the property,a Family Dollar Store,will require the additional level of conditional use permit review. STAFF RECOMMENDAT ION Staf f recommends approval of the requested C-1 zoning. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(AUGUST 17,2000) William Putnam was present representing the application. There were several parties present who expressed either support or interest.Letters of support had been received from Janet Berry,president of Southwest Little Rock United for Progress,and Norm Floyd,a member of the Steering Committee for the Chicot West/I-30 South Neighborhood Action Plan. After meeting with the persons present at the meeting, Mr.Putnam amended his application to include a 20 foot wide 4 .august 17,2000 ITEM NO.:3 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-6011-A "OS"Open Space zoned strip along the northern perimeter of the site and along the western perimeter where the site is adjacent to property indicated as Single Family by the adopted Land Use Plan.In response to a question from Chair Adcock,all parties indicated support for the amended application.Staff recommended approval of the application, as amended.Staff informed the Commission that there had been a modification of Public Works'omments eliminating the requirement to dedicate floodway since it had been determined that the site does not lie within the regulatory floodway. A motion was made to approve the application as amended to include the 20-foot wide "OS"strip along the northern perimeter and a portion of the western perimeter.The motion was approved by a vote of 8 ayes,0 noes and 3 absent. 5 &gust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:3.1 FILE NO.:LUOO-15-01 Name:Land Use Plan Amendment —Geyer Springs West Planning District Location:North side of Mabelvale West Road,west of Darris Drive R~e est:Mixed Use to Commercial Source:Robert Ashcroft by William B.Putnam PROPOSAL /REQUEST: Land Use Plan amendment in the Geyer Springs West Planning District from Mixed Use to Commercial.The Commercial category includes a broad range of retail and wholesale sales of products,personal and professional services,and general business activities.Commercial activities vary in type and scale,depending on the trade area they serve.The applicant wishes to construct a retail store on the property. Prompted by this Land Use Amendment request,the Planning Staff expanded the area of review to include the C-3 zone land to the east of the applicant'property. With these changes,the entirety of the area designated Mixed Use east of Mabelvale Main and north of Mabelvale Pike would be changed.The additional area would recognize the commercial activities east of the applicant's property. EXISTING LAND USE AND ZONING: The expanded area is zoned 0-3 General Office and C-3 General Commercial and consists of approximately 7.36+ acres.The applicant's property is vacant while a convenience store sits on part of the C-3 General Commercial zone closest to the applicant'property.The rest of the C-3 General Commercial zone remains vacant.The property zoned R —2 Single Family located to the east is occupied by an apartment building.The neighboring property to the north is zoned R-2 Single Family and OS Open Space.The property north of the expanded area lies vacant while houses ugust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:3.1 (Cont.)FILE NO.:LUOO-15 —01 are located along Mabelvale Pike.The property to the south consists of single family houses built on land zoned R-2 Single Family.The R-2 Single Family property to the west consists of houses built along Nash Lane as well as a day care center located directly to the west of the property in question.The 0-3 General Office along Mabelvale West Road consists of a few houses and the First Missionary Baptist Church.The land south of Mabelvale West Road is zoned I-1 Industrial Park and I-2 Light Industrial.Truck terminals occupy most of the land in both districts. FUTURE LAND USE PLAN AND RECENT AMENDMENTS: On November 4,1997 multiple changes took place within a mile radius of the applicant's property including the change from Mixed Office Commercial to Mixed Use on the applicant's property. The expanded area is shown as Mixed Use on the Future Land Use Plan.The area to the north is shown as Park/Open Space and Single Family.The property to the east is shown as Single Family.The land to the south is shown as Mixed Use and Mixed Commercial and Industrial.The property to the west is shown as Mixed Use along Mabelvale West Road and Single Family further north. MASTER STREET PLAN: Mabelvale West Road,Mabelvale Pike,and Mabelvale Main Street are all shown as Minor Arterials on the Master Street Plan.These streets are not built to city standards for minor arterials.There are no bikeways shown on the Master Street Plan that would be affected by this amendment. PARKS: Morehart Park is shown on the Park System Master Plan on Mabelvale Cut-Off Road about 1/3 of a mile east of the applicant's property.Morehart Park is not affected by this amendment. 2 ..~gust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:3.1 (Cont.)FILE NO.:LU00-15-01 CITY RECOGNIZED NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PLAN: The applicant's property is located in an area covered by the Chicot West /I-30 South neighborhood action plan.The neighborhood action plan contains an infrastructure goal of widening and improving Mabelvale West Road to Minor Arterial standards.The plan also contains the objectives of attracting better restaurants and neighborhood oriented businesses to the area under the economic development goal. Actions statements concerning economic development include identifying and attracting desirable businesses that are oriented toward the middle class consumer as well as expanding Neighborhood Commercial uses at the intersections of arterials.The Infrastructure goal also contains a goal of bringing all streets up to city standards. ANALYSIS . The area in question is located at the intersection of two arterials which could serve as a community center in the Chicot /I-30 West Study Area.The application area is located at the north terminus of Mabelvale Main Street, which serves as the axis for the Mabelvale community. Mabelvale West Road intersects with I-30 to the west and connects the neighborhood to outlying areas in Saline County.Mabelvale Pike Road connects the Mabelvale neighborhood to the rest of Little Rock lying north of the neighborhood.This location is also suitable for small businesses likely to cater the needs of residents living in the Mabelvale neighborhood.Approval of this amendment will recognize the existing business located in the area zoned C- 3 General Commercial.In addition,approval of this amendment would also allow for the development of a broad range of Commercial uses suitable for larger scale businesses serving a larger market area. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: Notices were sent to the following neighborhood associations:Allendale N.A., Chicot N.A.,Cloverdale N.A.,Deer Meadow N.A.,Legion Hut N.A.,Mavis Circle N.A.,Pinedale N.A.,Rob Roy Way N.A., Santa Monica N.A.,Shiloh H.A.,Town &Country Estates N.A., West Baseline N.A.,Yorkwood N.A. 3 august 17,2000 ITEM NO.:3.1 (Cont.)FILE NO.:LUOO-15-01 Staff has not received any comments from area residents. None are in support,none are opposed to the change and none were neutral. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staf f believes the change is appropriate. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(AUGUST 17,2000) The item was placed on the consent agenda for approval.A motion was made to approve the consent agenda and was approved with a vote of 8 ayes,0 noes and 3 absent. 4 august 17,2000 ITEM NO.:4 FILE NO.:Z-6888 Owner:Pam Brown Courtney Applicant:Pam Brown Courtney Location:2109 John Barrow Road Request:Rezone from R-2 Single Family to 0-3 General Office. Purpose:Construct medical office building Size:9.94+acres Existing Use:Two abandoned houses,wooded SURROUND ING LAND USE AND ZONING North —Undeveloped,wooded;zoned R-4 and 0-1 South —Single Family,wooded and Parkview High; zoned R-2 East —Undeveloped,wooded;zoned R-4 West —Undeveloped;wooded;zoned R-2 PUBLI C WORKS COMMENTS 1.Barrow Road is listed on the Master Street Plan as a minor arterial.A dedication of right —of-way 45 feet from centerline is required. With Buildin Permit 2 .Property frontage needs to have the sidewalks and ramps brought up to the current ADA standards. 3.Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that is damaged in the public right-of-way prior to occupancy. 4.Driveways shall conform to Sec.31-210 or Ordinance 18,031. 5.Stormwater detention ordinance applies to this property. 6.Easements for proposed stormwater detention facilities are required. 7.A Sketch Grading and Drainage Plan per Sec.29-186(e) will be required with a building permit. 8.A Grading Permit per Secs.29-186(c)and (d)will be required with a building permit. 9.Contact the ADEQ for approval prior to start of work. August 17,2000 ITEM NO.:4 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-6888 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT The site is not located on a CATA Bus Route.The nearest route is located on Kanis Road,several blocks north of this site. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION All owners of property located within 200 feet of the site, all residents within 300 feet and the John Barrow,Brownwood Terrace,Twin Lakes "B"and Campus Place Neighborhood Associations were notified of the rezoning request. LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT The property is located in the Boyle Park Planning District. The adopted Plan currently recommends SF (Single Family)for the site.A Land Use Plan Amendment has been filed asking that the Plan designation for this site be changed to O (Office).See item no.4.1 on this agenda,LU00-10-01. Staff has expanded the original request to include the 10+ acres immediately to the south,between this site and Parkview High School. The property lies within the area covered by the John Barrow Neighborhood Area Action Plan that was adopted in May 1996. That plan is currently in the process of being reviewed by the neighborhood committee.One goal of the Action Plan is to encourage new businesses to locate in the area, particularly medical office development along John Barrow Road.Staff believes the Office Land Use Plan Amendment and rezoning request meet the goal of the Neighborhood Action Plan. STAFF ANALYSIS The request before the Commission is to rezone this 9.94+ acre tract from "R-2"Single Family to "0-3"General Office district.Two dilapidated single family residences are located on the front (west)of the tract,within 120+feet of John Barrow Road.The remainder of the property is undeveloped and wooded.A large pond is located near the center of the property.The applicant,representing 2 August 17,2000 ITEM NO.:4 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-6888 Arkansas Neurology and Epilepsy Center,proposes to build a new office building on the site once it is rezoned to 0-3. The property is located on the east side of John Barrow Road,approximately 300 feet north of the large Parkview High School Campus.The property measures approximately 330 feet in width and 1,300+feet in depth.The eastern 1,150+ foot portion of the tract is wooded,with a large pond.A similarly sized R —2 zoned tract is adjacent to the south. This adjacent tract is also mostly wooded and undeveloped, with a couple of residential structures on the western (John Barrow Road)end of the tract.The 0-1 and R —4 zoned properties adjacent to the north and east are wooded and undeveloped.An undeveloped,wooded R-2 zoned tract is located across John Barrow Road to the &est.Other uses in the immediate vicinity include medical supply and support businesses,a beauty shop and multifamily developments. Farther to the east and beyond Parkview High School to the south,the properties are mostly single family. The Boyle Park District Land Use Plan currently recommends single family for this property.A Land Use Plan Amendment has been filed asking that the Plan designation be changed to Office.Staff has expanded the application to include the 10+acre tract adjacent to the south,between the applicant's property and Parkview High School.The effect of the amendment,as modified by staff,is to create a 20+ acre Office area of the same depth and nearly the same size as the high school campus.This broadens the potential for additional office uses being developed in the area,perhaps even in a small,office park type development focused onto Barrow Road. One recommendation for action within the John Barrow Neighborhood Action Plan is: ~Encourage additional medical office development in the Baptist Medical Center area and along Kanis and John Barrow Roads to the north of Parkview High School. The action plan points to the prospect of development of ancillary medical health offices along Kanis and John Barrow Roads and states that the neighborhood should encourage this type of development as a source of new jobs. The potential for the development of new retail uses, restaurants and a grocery store in the area,needs 3 ..&gust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:4 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-6888 identified in the action plan,is enhanced by new office development and the accompanying jobs. Staff is supportive of the requested 0-3 zoning and believes development of the property as office is compatible with uses and zoning in the area.Staff believes it is appropriate to zone a 50 foot wide OS (Open Space)strip along the eastern perimeter and a portion of the northern perimeter where the site is adjacent to undeveloped,R-4 zoned property.If the Commission does not support expanding the Land Use Plan Amendment to include the 10+ acre tract adjacent to the south,a 50 foot OS strip along the southern perimeter of the applicant's property would then be appropriate. STAFF RE COMMENDAT ION Staff recommends approval of the requested 0-3 zoning with a 50 foot wide OS strip to be located along the eastern perimeter and the portion of the northern perimeter where the site is adjacent to R-4,residential zoned property. Additionally,if the Commission does not support expanding the Land Use Plan Amendment to include the 10+acre tract adjacent to the south,staff recommends that a 50 foot OS strip be located along the southern perimeter of the site. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(AUGUST 17,2000) The applicant was present.There were no objectors present. A letter of support had been received from the John Barrow Neighborhood Association.Staff presented the item and recommended approval of the requested 0-3 zoning with a 50 foot wide "OS"zoned strip to be located along the eastern perimeter and the portion of the northern perimeter where the site is adjacent to R-4,residentially zoned property. The applicant offered no additional comments. The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved as recommended by staff.The vote was 8 ayes,0 noes and 3 absent. 4 &gust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:4.1 FILE NO.:LUOO-10-01 Name:Land Use Plan Amendment —Boyle Park Planning District Location:2109 John Barrow Road Receuest:Single Family tc Office Source:Pam Brown Courtney PROPOSAL /REQUEST: Land Use Plan amendment in the Boyle Park Planning District from Single Family to Office.The Office category represents services represents services provided directly to consumers (e.g.,legal,financial,medical)as well as general offices that support basic economic activities.The applicant wishes to construct a medical office building on the property. Prompted by this Land Use Amendment request,the Planning Staff expanded the area of review to include the property between the area shown as Public Institutional at Parkview High School and the applicant'property.These changes would result in a continuous area shown as Office extending from Parkview High School to the Church located north of Labette Drive. EXISTING LAND USE AND ZONING: The modified area is currently zoned R-2 Single Family and is approximately 19.88+acres in size.The vacant property along John Barrow Road north of the applicant's property is zoned 0-1 Quiet Office while the property to the rear located south of the subdivision along Labette Drive is zoned R-4 Two Family.The vacant property to the east is zoned R-2 Single Family.The campus of the Parkview High School to the south is zoned R-2 Single Family.The vacant property west of the modified area is zoned R —2 Single Family.A barbershop is located southwest of the applicant's property on land zoned 0-3 General Office. ugust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:4.1 (Cont.)FILE NO.:LUOO-10 —01 FUTURE LAND USE PLAN AND RECENT AMENDMENTS: On April 16,1999 a change was made from Single Family to Suburban Office on Aldersgate Road about a mile west of the applicant's property. On December 1,1999 a change was made from Multi-Family to Mixed Office Commercial on Labette Drive about 1,000 feet northwest of the applicant's property. On June 18,1996,multiple changes were made along John Barrow Road between Kanis Road and West 28 Street within a mile north and south of the applicant'property. The area is shown as Single Family on the Future Land Use Plan.The property to the north is shown as Office and Single Family.The property east of the area under review is shown as Single Family.The property located south of the amendment area is shown as Public Institutional.The property to the west is divided between Mixed Office Commercial and Multi —Family. MASTER STREET PLAN: John Barrow Road is shown on the Master Street Plan as a minor arterial.There are no bikeways shown on the Master Street Plan for this portion of John Barrow Road. PARKS: The Park System Master Plan does not show any existing or proposed parks in the area. CITY RECOGNIZED NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PLAN: The applicant's property lies in an area covered by the John Barrow Neighborhood Area Plan.The business and commercial development goal contains the objectives of attracting job- generating businesses to the area and encouragement of land assembly guidelines for construction of new business and commercial facilities.The Market Analysis Summery contained in the plan recommended encouragement of medical office developments in the Baptist Medical Center area and along Kanis and John Barrow Roads to the north of Parkview High School. 2 ~gust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:4.1 (Cont.)FILE NO.:LUOO-10-01 ANALYSIS: The applicant'property is located in a suburban area characterized by low-density development patterns.The area in question is located about 4 of a mile south of the commercial uses located at the intersection of John Barrow and Kanis Roads.The campus of the Baptist Medical Center is located about 1/3 of a mile to the west of the John Barrow and Kanis Road intersection.The location of the amendment area could attract office uses that could service both businesses and medical uses located along Kanis Road. The area in question could also serve as a transition between the intense commercial and office uses located on Kanis Road and the less intense residential uses located primarily to the south.The size and depth of the property in question is suitable for an office park development that could be accessed by either a cul de sac or loop streets. An office development covering the extent of the proposed amendment would also address the need for infill development in the area. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: Notices were sent to the following neighborhood associations:John Barrow N.A.,Broadmoor N.A.,Brownwood Terrace N.A.,College Terrace N.A.,Point O'Woods N.A., University N.A.,and Westwood N.A.Staff has not received any comments from area residents.None are in support,none are opposed to the change and none were neutral. STAFF RE COMMENDAT I ON S: Staff believes the change is appropriate. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(AUGUST 17,2000) The item was placed on the consent agenda for approval.A motion was made to approve the consent agenda and was approved with a vote of 8 ayes,0 noes and 3 absent. 3 ~~gus t 17,2 00 0 ITEM NO.:5 FILE NO.:Z-6894 Owner:Purtell Marketing Company Applicant:Charles A.Johnson,Jr. Location:4811,4815 and 4817 Stagecoach Road Request:Rezone from R-2 Single Family to C-3 General Commercial. Purpose:Speculative commercial Size:3 lots totaling 2.46+acres Existing Use:3 single family homes,wooded SURROUND ING LAND USE AND ZONING North —Single Family;zoned R-2 South —Nonconforming commercial site and Single Family;zoned R-2 East —Undeveloped,wooded;zoned R-2 West —Farmers Association Supply store;zoned C-4 PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS 1.Stagecoach Road is listed on the Master Street Plan as a principal arterial,dedication of right-of-way to 55 feet from centerline is required. With Buildin Permit 2.Provide design of street conforming to "MSP"(Master Street Plan).Construct one-half street improvement to these streets including 5-foot sidewalks with planned development. 3.Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for approval prior to start of work. 4.Stormwater detention ordinance applies to this property. 5.Grading permit will be required on this development,ifitdisturbsmorethanoneacre. 6.A Grading Permit for Special Flood Hazard Area per Sec. 29-186 (b)will be required. 7.A Development Permit for Flood Hazard Area per Sec.8- 283 will be required. gust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:5 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z —6894 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT The site is not located on a CATA Bus Route.The nearest route is located just east of the site,at Asher Avenue/Colonel Glenn Road. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION All owners of property located within 200 feet of the site, all residents within 300 feet and the Westwood,Pecan Lake, Stagecoach/Dodd and John Barrow Neighborhood Associations were notified of the rezoning request. LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT The site is located in the Boyle Park Planning District. The adopted Land Use Plan currently recommends SF (Single Family)for the site.A Land Use Plan Amendment has been filed asking that the Plan designation be changed to C (Commercial).See item no.5.1 on this agenda,LU00-10-02. The property lies within the area covered by the Pecan Lake- Stagecoach/Dodd-Westwood Neighborhood Action Plan that was adopted on April 4,2000.The Policy Plans of all three neighborhoods state their opposition to further commercial zoning along Stagecoach Road. STAFF ANAL YS I S The request before the Commission is to rezone three tracts, totaling 2.46+acres located at 4811,4815 and 4817 Stagecoach Road from R-2 Single Family to C-3 General Commercial.One single family home is located on each of the tracts.The homes are located on the front of the tracts,within 150 feet of Stagecoach Road.The rear of the 2.46+acres is wooded.No specific development is proposed at this time.The applicant states the purpose of the rezoning as being "speculative commercial." The property is located on the east side of Stagecoach Road, approximately 400 feet south of the Asher Avenue-Colonel Glenn-Stagecoach intersection.Uses on the east side of Stagecoach Road,in this area,one primarily single family 2 a-gust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:5 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-6894 residential.The property is bounded on the north and a portion of the south by R-2 zoned properties containing single family homes.The R-2 zoned property to the east is undeveloped.A nonconforming restaurant/bar is located on the R-2 zoned property fronting Stagecoach Road to the south.Uses across Stagecoach Road to the west are varied; ranging from a large church and single family homes on R-2 zoned property to a C-3 zoned second-hand store and a C-4 zoned feed store and farm supply business.The owner of the nonconforming restaurant/bar has also filed for C-3 zoning. That request has been deferred to allow for negotiations regarding right-of-way acquisition and will most likely be amended to a Planned Development application to accommodate this 50 year old,nonconforming use. The Boyle Park District Land Use Plan recommends single family for this site.A Land Use Plan Amendment has been filed asking that the Plan be amended to Commercial. Staff is not supportive of the rezoning request.Allowing C-3 General Commercial zoning will affect those single family properties abutting the site on the north,south and east.If this site were rezoned,it would be virtually impossible to avoid the commercial rezoning of the 3-4 tracts immediately north of the site,extending the commercial zoning to Asher Avenue and further "stripping out"Stagecoach Road.The Policy Plans of all three neighborhoods included in the recently adopted Pecan Lake- Stagecoach/Dodd-Westwood Neighborhood Action Plan clearly state their opposition to additional commercial zoning along Stagecoach Road: ~Discourage conversion of R-2 zoned properties along Stagecoach Road (Pecan Lake). ~Encourage non-residential developments to occupy the area north of David O'Dodd Road and west of Shackleford Road —allowing remaining areas to be reserved for low density residential uses (Pecan Lake). ~Discourage and strongly oppose "spot-zoning"along Stagecoach Road (Stagecoach/Dodd). ~Encourage new non-residential development west of Shackleford Road and north of David O'Dodd (Stagecoach/Dodd). ~Commercial and office activities should remain on Asher Avenue (Westwood). 3 ..august 17,2000 ITEM NO.:5 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-6894 ~Object to any applications requesting the conversion of single family homes —except those on Asher Avenue (Westwood). As was previously mentioned,the homes on these three tracts are located 130-150 feet away from Stagecoach Road.The front yards of each property are fairly tree-covered.There does not seem to be any problem with the continued viable use of these properties as single family.In staff's opinion,this speculative commercial rezoning is unwarranted and inappropriate. STAFF RECOMMENDAT ION Staff recommends denial of the C-3 rezoning request. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(AUGUST 17,2000) The applicant was present.There was one objector present. Letters of opposition had been received from the Westwood Neighborhood Association and Southwest Little Rock United for Progress.The applicant presented a letter requesting withdrawal of the item,without prejudice. A motion was made to waive the Commission'bylaws to accept the last minute request for withdrawal.The motion was approved by a vote of 8 ayes,0 noes and 3 absent.A motion was then made to withdraw the item,without prejudice.That motion was also approved by a vote of 8 ayes,0 noes and 3 absent. 4 WESTWOOD NEIG H BOR HOOD ASSOCIATION P.Q.BQX 4671 LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 2~~c WORKING TOGETHER (net ~+3 M~Azyl~l~ &/E V -k Ay(c 12zw~i pg ( 0 ~q~I TAA '-) ~~~(«-(-"~4....t,"~.+A.~ ~o.~i,u~C.~k.4 o. t5~P ~~/-P»&~4,,)~.~.'g-o A ii.g /yelp /f1~p 0 Q ~t Q DIL ~R.. p,A+w~.L~.~(,(...l ~&Q.g~+[ ~(QV//4C/S i „4'+Rl 75k 'ce,~g Qo 5 s~p-Z Qwuc &c-~&=-'(,-4-4~.i ~,((e~c.+F;~~t~F-'D JU 6 2000 B&: .august 17,2000 ITEM NO.:5.1 FILE NO.:LUOO-10-02 Name:Land Use Plan Amendment —Boyle Park Planning District Location:4811,4815,and 4817 Stagecoach Road R~e est:Single yamily to Commercial Source:Charles Johnson PROPOSAL /REQUEST: Land Use Plan amendment in the Boyle Park Planning District from Single Family to Commercial.The Commercial category includes a broad range of retail and wholesale sales of products,personal and professional services,and general business activities.Commercial activities vary in type and scale,depending on the trade area they serve.The applicant wishes to use the property for "small-scale development providing goods/services to neighborhood." EXISTING LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is occupied by three houses on deep lots currently zoned R-2 Single Family and is approximately 2.5+ acres in size.The neighboring property is zoned R-2 Single Family and occupied by single-family houses except for the property to the south occupied by a tavern.The property to the west is zoned C-4 Open Display Commercial and split between a feed store and used furniture/appliance store. FUTURE LAND USE PLAN AND RECENT AMENDMENTS: On November 2,1999 a change took place from Neighborhood Commercial to Service Trades District at Shackleford and Stagecoach about a mile southwest of the applicant's property. On December 1,1998 a change took place from Suburban Office to Mixed Use at Col.Glenn Road at Talley Road about a mile west of the applicant's property. ugust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:5.1 (Cont.)FILE NO.:LUOO-10-02 On July 7,1998 a change took place from Single Family to Mixed Office Commercial about a mile north of the applicant's property. On June 3,1997 a change took place from Neighborhood Commercial to Single Family about 500'est of the applicant's property. On June 3,1997 a change took place from Single Family to Commercial at Stagecoach Road and Asher Avenue about 800'ortheastoftheapplicant'property. On June 18,1996 multiple changes took place on Colonel Glenn Road about 1,000 feet north of the applicant's property. On March 19,1996 multiple changes took place at W.36 Street and John Barrow Road about a mile north of the applicant's property. On August 1,1995 a change took place from Single Family to Public Institutional on W.36 Street east of Shackleford Road about a mile northwest of the applicant's property. The applicant's property is shown as Single Family on the Future Land Use Plan.All of the neighboring property on the east side of Stagecoach Road is shown as Single Family while the property west of the application area is shown as Neighborhood Commercial.A substantial area of Commercial is also shown along Asher Avenue extending east from the Stagecoach and Colonel Glenn Road intersection to the Asher Avenue and John Barrow Road intersection.A large tract of Neighborhood Commercial is shown east of the Heritage Baptist Temple School and south of Susie Lane. MASTER STREET PLAN: Stagecoach Road is shown on the Master Street Plan as a Principal Arterial.Currently,this section of Stagecoach Road does not meet city standards for a Principal Arterial. The Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department is realigning the Stagecoach,Colonel Glenn,and Asher Avenue intersection to create a T-shape intersection with Stagecoach Road intersecting Asher Avenue /Col.Glenn Road at a 90 degree angle.The improvements to the Stagecoach, Colonel Glenn,and Asher Avenue intersection as a part of the improvements of State Highway 5 on Asher Avenue is likely to effect the alignment and width of Stagecoach Road 2 ugust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:5.1 (Cont.)FILE NO.:LUOO-10 —02 in front of the applicant'property.The Master Street Plan does not show bikeways that would be affected by this amendment. PARKS: The Park System Master Plan shows a Priority 1 Proposed Open Space along Brodie Creek.The proposed open space is not affected by this amendment. CITY RECOGNIZED NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PLAN: The applicant's property lies in an area covered by the Westwood section of the Pecan Lake,Westwood,Stagecoach- Dodd neighborhood Action Plan.The Westwood section of the plan states that Commercial and Office activities should remain on Asher Avenue and objects to the conversion of homes to non-residential uses except on Asher Avenue.Both the Stagecoach —Dodd section and Pecan Lake section of the plan oppose "spot zoning"along Stagecoach Road and encourage non —residential development to take place west of Shackleford Road and north of David O'Dodd Road. ANALYSIS: Large tract residential and spots of commercial uses have occurred along Stagecoach Road resulting in low-density development.There is a current inventory of vacant property in the immediate vicinity both zoned commercial or shown as Commercial or Neighborhood Commercial on the Land Use Plan. A 16.4+acre tract of vacant land shown as Neighborhood Commercial zoned C-3 General Commercial sits south of Susie Lane.12.8+acres of this tract is zoned C-3 General Commercial while 3.6+acres is zoned 0-3 General Office. Most of the area shown as Commercial along Asher Avenue consists of property zoned either C-3 General Commercial or C-4 Open Display Commercial.The area along Asher Avenue shown as Commercial also contains 1.17+acres of vacant properties zoned C-3 General Commercial. The application area extends 662.38 feet from the front property line to the rear and is 299.95 feet wide at the front.The narrow shape of the application area would cause an incursion of land shown as Commercial into an area shown as Single Family.The topography of the application area 3 ~gust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:5.1 (Cont.)FILE NO.:LU00-10-02 slopes uphill to the back of the property.Any development likely taking place at the rear of the property would cause a loss of buffers between commercial uses on the property and residential uses behind the property. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: Notices were sent to the following neighborhood associations:John Barrow N.A.,Broadmoor N.A.,Brownwood Terrace N.A.,College Terrace N.A.,Point O'Woods N.A., University N.A.,Westwood N.A.,Pecan Lake P.O.A.,and Stagecoach-Dodd N.A.Staff has received one comment from area residents.None are in support,none are opposed to the change and one was neutral. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff believes the change is not appropriate. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(AUGUST 17,2000) The item was placed on the consent agenda for withdrawal.A motion was made to approve the consent agenda and was approved with a vote of 8 ayes,0 noes and 3 absent. 4 August 17,2000 ITEM NO.:6 FILE NO.:Z-6895 Owner:Pamela Smith Applicant:Kelly Floyd Location:16205 Raines Road Request:Rezone from R-2 Single Family to R-7A Manufactured Home District and Site Plan Review Purpose:Placement of a single-wide manufactured home Size:1.41+acres Existing Use:Single-wide manufactured home, wooded SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING North —Vacant residence and large undeveloped,wooded area;zoned R-2 South —Wooded and Single Family;zoned R-2 East —Wooded and manufactured homes;zoned R-2 West —Single Family;zoned R-2 PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS No Comments. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT The site is located outside of the City and is not on a CATA Bus Route. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION All owners of property located within 200 feet of the site and the Otter Creek and Crystal Valley Neighborhood Associations were notified of the rezoning request.The property is located outside of the city and staff does not have the data to notify residents living within 300 feet of the site.The required sign was posted on the property. r ~gust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:6 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-6895 LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT The site is located outside of the city limits but is within the City's Planning Boundary and zoning jurisdiction.The property is in the Crystal Valley Planning District.The adopted Plan recommends SF (Single Family)for the site. R-7A is a single family zoning district that provides for placement of a single family dwelling,either a manufactured home or an on-site constructed home,on an individual lot. As such,the request conforms to the adopted Plan.The property is not within an area covered by a neighborhood action plan.No action plan is proposed for this area in the immediate future. STAFF ANAL YS I S The request before the Commission is to rezone this 1.41+ acre tract from "R-2"Single Family to "R-7A"Manufactured Home district and to approve a site plan allowing for placement of a 16'80',manufactured home on the site. The applicant was not aware of the zoning restrictions and has already placed the home on the site.The City initiated enforcement and the applicant filed for the rezoning and site plan review. The property is located outside of the city limits but within the City'Planning and Zoning jurisdiction.The site is located at the southeast corner of Raines Road and Merry Lane.Only the immediate homesite has been cleared. The remainder of the 1.41+acre tract is heavily wooded. Placement of the home does exceed a].l required setbacks but the home has not yet been permanently sited,pending resolution of the rezoning request.A single driveway accesses the site from Merry Lane. The surrounding area is rural in nature,consisting primarily of single family homes on larger tracts and large areas of undeveloped,heavily wooded land.The property across Raines Road to the north is mostly wooded and undeveloped.A vacant residential structure is located within this wooded area.The wooded tracts immediately adjacent to the east and south are also owned by this same property owner.Her home is located south of this site. The manufactured home is to be occupied by the property owner'daughter and her family.A site-built single family 2 a~gust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:6 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-6895 home is located across Merry Lane to the west.Numerous other manufactured homes,both single-wide and multi- sectional,are located in the area.The proposed use of this 1.41+acre tract for placement of one,single-wide manufactured home is compatible with uses and development in the area.Placement of the home must conform to the following siting criteria established in Section 36- 262(d)(2)of the Code: a.A pitched roof of three (3)in twelve (12)or fourteen (14)degrees or greater. b.Removal of all transport features. c.Permanent foundation. d.Exterior wall finished in a manner compatible with the neighborhood. e.Underpinning with permanent materials. f.Orientation compatible with placement of adjacent structures. g.Off-street parking per single-family dwelling standards. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staf f recommends approval of the requested R-7A rezoning and of the proposed site plan subject to compliance with the siting criteria established in Section 36 —262 (d)(2)of the Code. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT:(JULY 13,2000) The applicant was not present.Staff presented the site plan for the Committee's review.There were no comments. The item was forwarded to the full Commission for resolution. 3 ~~gust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:6 (Cont.)FILE NO.:Z-6895 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(AUGUST 17,2000) The applicant was present.There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and recommended approval of the R-7A rezoning and of the site plan subject to compliance with the siting criteria established in Section 36-262(d)(2) of the Code. The applicant offered no additional comments. The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved as recommended by staff.The vote was 8 ayes,0 noes and 3 absent. 4 .~gust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:7 FILE NO.:LU00-05 —01 Name:Land Use Plan Amendment —Downtown Planning District Location:Various Locations ~Re est:Various Requests per Capitol View/Stifft's Station Neighborhood Action Plan Source:Capitol View Stifft's Station Neighborhood Action Plan PROPOSAL /REQUEST: Land Use Plan amendment in the Downtown Planning District from Service Trades District to Mixed Use and Service Trades District to Public Institutional and Parks and Open Space. The Public Institutional category includes all public and quasi facilities which provide a variety of services to the community such as schools,libraries,fire stations, churches,utility substations and hospitals. The Parks/Open Space category includes all public parks, recreation facilities,greenbelts,flood plains and other designated open space,and recreation lands. The Mixed Use category provides for a mixture of residential,office and commercial uses to occur.A Planning Zoning District is required if the use is entirely office or commercial or if the use is a mixture of the three. EXISTING LAND USE AND ZONING: A portion of the property is currently zoned POD (the Cathedral School location).A PCD is located on the corner of Cantrell Road and North Street the remainder of the area is zoned 0-3.A portion of the area (which was not included in the Cathedral School POD)is zoned I-3.These areas are predominately adjacent to the railroad right-of-way (and shown on the Future Land Use Plan as Parks and Open Space). 0-2 (Dillard'Headquarters)and 0-3 zoning is located to the north of the site. ..~gust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:7 (Cont.)FILE NO.:LUOO-05-01 FUTURE LAND USE PLAN AND RECENT AMENDMENTS: March 7,2000,a change from various land uses to Mixed Use Urban was made to an area to the east to the east of the proposed changes.The Mixed Use Urban was made to an area bounded by the Arkansas River,I-630,the Union Pacific Railroad and I-30. November 16,1999,a change was made from Single Family to Mixed Use south and west of the area in the 3200 block of W.7 Street. On April 20,1999,a change from Single Family to Mixed Use was filed adjacent to W.12 Street.These changes were recommendations made by the Stephens Neighborhood Action Plan Steering Committee. As a part of the implementation of the Capitol View/Stifft's Station Neighborhood Action Plan the Future Land Use Plan was reviewed (July 16,1996).Several changes were recommended (Multi Family to Mixed Office Warehouse —south of W.7 Street,Low Density Multi Family to Single Family south of W.6 Street,Low Density Multi Family to Office -north of W.7 Street,Single Family to Parks and Open Space —south of Boone/W.Markham Street and adjacent to the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way,Low Density Multi Family to Single Family —north of W.Markham Street and Industrial to Mixed Office Warehouse —east of Gill Street and west of the Union Pacific Railroad). In January and June of 1996 two Single Family designations were changed to Public Institutional.The Central High Visitors Center and the Little Rock School District are housed at the locations of these changes. MASTER STREET PLAN: Cantrell Road is shown as a Principal Arterial and North Street is shown as a local street on the plan.A Class III bikeway is designated north of Cantrell Road from Riverfront Drive to Gill Street crossing under Cantrell Road and following Cantrell Road to North Street.Then following North Street to the Railroad Tracks at LaHarpe then once again crossing under Cantrell Road and following along the river.Also in the area is a proposed Class I bikeway which 2 .~gust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:7 (Cont.)FILE NO.:LUOO-05-01 is adjacent to the railroad right-of-way and Gill Street following along to the intersection with the bikeway at Cantrell Road. PARKS: There are no park sites in the immediate vicinity or any park sites currently included in the Master Parks Plan for the area. CITY RECOGNIZED NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PLAN: The Capitol View/Stifft's Station Neighborhood Action Plan contains two goals relevant to these requested changes.Thefirstgoalconcernscommunitypreservationgoalwhich indicates the desire to involve all segments of the neighborhood in identifying,protecting and enhancing key structures and places.The second goal,private investment goal is to promote private investment in the neighborhood. Action statements which will assist in the development of these goals are to review the future land use plan to identify possible areas for changes and to amend the future land use plan to reflect public institutional uses in the area and to reduce the intensity of uses allowed on the eastern edge of the neighborhood.With mixed use developments and a planned development review the neighborhood as well as the developer will be better able to develop projects that "fit the image"of the neighborhood. As a part of the Capitol View/Stifft'Station Neighborhood Action Plan a recommendation for inclusion in the future Parks Master Plan is the development of a trail through the neighborhood following east and south along the railroad right-of-way then at W.5 and W.6 Streets turning west and ending at the War Memorial Fitness Center.As a part of this proposal several vacant lots within the area are suggested to be converted into neighborhood "pocket-parks". ANALYSIS: The area is a predominately "built-out"area.The request is to recognize existing land uses in the area by changing the site of the Cathedral School to Public Institutional and a strip of Parks and Open Space on the west side of the site (this in keeping with the POD on file).The request is also to change an area south of Cantrell Road and north of North 3 .~gust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:7 (Cont.)FILE NO.:LUOO-05-01 Street to Mixed Use.This area is currently redeveloping as a mixture of office and commercial while retaining a residential component. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: Notices were sent to the following neighborhood associations:Capitol View Stifft's Station Neighborhood Association and the Hillcrest Neighborhood Association. Staff has received five comments from area residents.Two in support,1 opposed to the change and 2 were neutral. Capitol View/Stifft's Station Neighborhood Association, which covers this site,is in support of the change. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff believes the change is appropriate.The changes would allow for recognition of existing land uses in the area as well as encourage the continued mixed pattern of redevelopment along Cantrell Road. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(AUGUST 17,2000) The item was placed on the Consent Agenda for approval by a vote of 8 ayes,0 noes and 3 absent the Commission approved the change. 4 gust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:8 FILE NO.:LUOO-09-03 Name:Land Use Plan Amendment —I-630 Planning District Location:Various Locations Receuest:Various Requests per Capitol View/Stiff t'Station Neighborhood Action Plan Source:Capitol View Stifft'Station Neighborhood Action Plan PROPOSAL /REQUE ST: Land Use Plan amendment in the I-630 Planning District from Neighborhood Commercial to Public Institutional and from Mixed Use to Public Institutional.Public Institutional category includes all public and quasi facilities which provide a variety of services to the community such as schools,libraries,fire stations,churches,utility substations and hospitals. EXISTING LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is currently zoned R-5 and R-4 with one area south of W.Capitol Avenue being zoned 0-3.Area to the west (UAMS facility)is zoned R-3 and area to the east is a predominately single family and duplex units with R —3 and a mixture of R-4 and R-5 on single lot zoning.C-3 (Burger King)and 0-3 zoning is located to the north of the area and R-4 and R-5 zoning is located to the south of the area. FUTURE LAND USE PLAN AND RECENT AMENDMENTS: November 16,1999,a change was made from Single Family to Mixed Use east of the area in the 3200 block of W.7 Street. On April 20,1999,several changes adjacent to W.12 Street were recommended by the Stephens Neighborhood Action Plan Steering Committee.Changes f rom Single Family to Mixed Use (8 amendments)and two amendments f rom S ingle Family to Public In s ti tu tional were f i led. As a part of the implementation of the Capitol View/Stifft' Station Neighborhood Action Plan the Future Land Use Plan was reviewed (July 16,1996).Several changes were gust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:8 (Cont.)FILE NO.:LUOO-09-03 recommended (Multi Family to Mixed Office Warehouse —south of W.7 Street,Low Density Multi Family to Single Family south of W.6 Street,Low Density Multi Family to Office -north of W.7 Street,Single Family to Parks and Open Space —south of Boone/W.Markham Street and adjacent to the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way,Low Density Multi Family to Single Family —north of W.Markham Street and Industrial to Mixed Office Warehouse —east of Gill Street and west of the Union Pacific Railroad). MASTER STREET PLAN: Pine and Cedar Streets are shown as collector streets on theplan.W.Capitol Avenue is also shown as a collectorstreet.The remainder of the streets in the area (S.ElmStreet,W.4 and W.6 Streets)are shown as localstreets.Class III bikeways are proposed adjacent to S. Pine and S.Cedar Streets and along W.Capitol Avenue. PARKS: There is a park facility (War Memorial Park)located to the west of the UAMS and VA campuses. CITY RECOGNIZED NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PLAN: The Capitol View/Stifft's Station Neighborhood Action Plancontainstwogoalsrelevanttotheserequestedchanges.Thefirstgoalconcernscommunitypreservationgoalwhichindicatesthedesiretoinvolveallsegmentsofthe neighborhood in identifying,protecting and enhancing keystructuresandplaces.The second goal,private investment goal is to promote private investment in the neighborhood. Action statements which will assist in the development ofthesegoalsaretoreviewthefuturelanduseplantoidentifypossibleareasforchangesandtoamendthefuture land use plan to reflect public institutional uses in theareaandtoreducetheintensityofusesallowedontheeasternedgeoftheneighborhood,Also action statementstosupportthechangeareworkingwithUAMStostabilizethewesternedgeoftheneighborhood,requesting UAMS allow the neighborhood to be involved in future campus plans,working with UAMS to stabilize the western edge of the neighborhood and continued communication by UAMS and the neighborhood onacquisitionanddevelopmentplans. 2 gust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:8 (Cont.)FILE NO.:LUOO-09-03 ANALYSIS: The area is currently developed as UAMS facilities and/or under UAMS's ownership (9 lots of the 123 lots are currently not owned by UAMS).The change would recognise existing ownership patterns and development in the area. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: After reviewing the comments received from property owners who had not "sold"to UAMS (and comments received from the Med,Center),staff has determined the change from Neighborhood Commercial and Mixed Use to Public Institutional would hinder development potential for area property owners.Staff supports the withdrawal request. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(AUGUST 17,2000) The item was placed on the Consent Agenda for withdrawal. The vote was 8 ayes,o noes and 3 absent. 3 ~august 17,2000 ITEM NO.:9 FILE NO.:G-25-177 NAME:14 Street to Daisy L.Gatson Bates Drive —Street Name Change LOCATION:Commerce Street to Woodrow Street PETITIONER:City of Little Rock PROPOSAL:To change the name of 14 "Street from Commerce Street west to South Woodrow Street to Daisy L.Gatson Bates Drive. 1.Abuttin Uses and Ownershi :Along 14 Street there is a mixture of residential,commercial,and office uses. There are 74 residences and 10 businesses along this section of 14 Street. 2.Nei hborhood Effect:A minimal detrimental effect is anticipated other than address changes for the properties addressed on 14 Street,and changing all of the street name signs. 3.Nei hborhood Position:Letters were sent to all 84 addresses on this section of 14""Street.The Post Office returned 15 of those as undeliverable,and there were no responses from 10 addresses.Through a combination of door to door canvassing by volunteers, and sending out letters directly to all addresses that could be identified,Public Works personnel attempted to contact all residents and occupants of businesses along this street.Of those contacted,38 agreed with the change,11 did not want the change,and 10 said they didn't care.In summary,70.2%of the occupants responded and 64.4%of the respondents were in favor of the name change. 4.Effect on Public Services:None.Neither Public Works nor the Fire Department object to the name change.The City of Little Rock will pay for the replacement of thestreetnamesigns.Public Works will accomplish the installation of the new street name signs. august 17,2000 ITEM NO.:9 (Cont.)FILE NO.:G-25-177 5.Utilities:No objections from the Utility Companies were expressed when they were notified of the proposed change. 6.STAFF ANALYSIS: The applicant is petitioning to change a 30-block section of 14 Street,from Commerce Street to South Woodrow Street,to Daisy L Gatson Bates Drive.This action was initiated in response to a recommendation bytheDaisyLeeGatsonBatesMemorialCommittee.The City Board of Directors passed a Resolution to proceed within the normal Street Name Change Process to rename a street in Little Rock after Mrs.Bates. This section of Fourteenth Street was chosen for two main reasons.First,it includes Central High School, which became internationally known as the forum where Mrs.Bates and "The Little Rock Nine"made their statement for equal rights.Secondly,this section of 14 "Street has a definite break at Commerce Street ontheeastend,and takes a definitive jog at South Woodrow Street on the west end.So that part of the road could be changed with minimal confusion to personstraveling14Street. All affected parties along 14 "Street were notified oftheproposedchangeand64.4%of the 70.2%of the respondents agreed with the change.No detrimentaleffectisanticipatedexceptforchangingtheaddressforthosepeoplewhonowhaveaddressesalongthissectionof14Street,plus all the street name signswillhavetobereplaced. The justification given for the change by the DaisyBatesMemorialCommitteewasthatsinceitwasunlikely"the City,state of Arkansas,and the nation in ourlifetimetoseeanotherstatelyladywiththepoise,grace dignity and courage of Mrs.Bates."The Committeealsonotedthat"Mrs.Bates legacy will forever beassociatedwithLittleRockCentralHighSchool,her mentoring the Little Rock Nine,and the City of LittleRock."Therefore,it was felt that it,would be propertohonorhermemorybygivingastreethername,and 2 gust 17,2000 ITEM NO.:9 (Cont.)FILE NO.:G-25-177 that the noted section of 14 Street would be appropriate. 7.STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the requested street name change of a portion of 14 Street to Daisy L.Gatson Bates Drive. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: The Subdivision Committee did not review this item. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:(AUGUST 17,2000) Wendell Jones was present representing the City DepartmentofPublicWorks.There was one interested party present whostatedthatshewasnotopposedtotherenamingofthestreet.Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval. A motion was made to approve the Street Name Change.The motion was approved by a vote of 8 ayes,0 noes and 3 absent. 3 PL A N N I N G CO M M I S S I O N VO T E RE C O R D Co h j $ ~7 '- Rf 4 0 C S F ~ la w ~i v e r ME M B E R 84 5 s. l j s. l g + , l 4 7 5 ~2 3 RE C T O R , BI L L v''O W N I N G , RI C H A R D A EA R N E S T , HU G H v Y Y v NU N N L E Y , OB R A Y A, BE R R Y , CR A I G v AD C O C K , PA M v RA H M A N , MI Z A N A LO W R Y , BO B v v AL L E N , FR E D , JR . v FA U S T , JU D I T H v v MU S E , RO H N v v v y ME M B E R RE C T O R , BI L L DO W N I N G , RI C H A R D EA R N E S T , HU G H NU N N L E Y , OB R A Y BE R R Y , CR A I G AD C O C K , PA M RA H M A N , MI Z A N LO W R Y , BO B AL L E N , FR E D , JR . FA U S T , JU D I T H MU E, RO H N Me e t i n g Ad j o u r n e d 4 ~+P.M. ~ AY E + NA Y E ~ AB S E N T % AB S T A I N R RE C U S E August 17,2000 There being no further business before the Commission,the meeting was adjourned at 6:15 p.m. Date 4 I CX'0 c -co e eta Chairman